[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH v2 1/1] dmioem: HPE OEM Record 199
From: |
Jean Delvare |
Subject: |
Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH v2 1/1] dmioem: HPE OEM Record 199 |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:54:56 +0100 |
Hi Jerry,
I'll send you all the relevant binary dump files. As a heads up though,
this is not an isolated case. In fact I do not have any example where
the CPU IDs of record type 199 make sense for AMD CPUs.
Jean
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:32:10 -0700, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> I'm not seeing this particular decode on the samples that I have
> tested with. Looks like you may have picked up some samples that
> I don't have. (note, I am not seeing an AMD EPYC 7451 on my tests..)
>
> Could you email me the binary dumps whose decode you question?
>
> thanks
>
> Jerry
>
> >
> > I like it very much, thanks.
> >
> > I tested it on my samples. The output makes sense for all Intel-based
> > systems. However for AMD-based systems, the CPU ID signature makes
> > little sense and doesn't match the installed CPU model. For example:
> >
> > Handle 0x0003, DMI type 199, 28 bytes
> > HPE ProLiant CPU Microcode Patch Support Info
> > CPU ID: Family 0, Model 1, Stepping 2
> > Date: 2018-02-09
> > Patch: 0x8001227
> > CPU ID: Family 0, Model 1, Stepping 1
> > Date: 2017-07-14
> > Patch: 0x8001129
> >
> > Handle 0x0084, DMI type 4, 48 bytes
> > Processor Information
> > Socket Designation: Proc 1
> > Type: Central Processor
> > Family: Zen
> > Manufacturer: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > ID: 12 0F 80 00 FF FB 8B 17
> > Signature: Family 23, Model 1, Stepping 2
> > (...)
> > Version: AMD EPYC 7451 24-Core Processor
> > (...)
> >
> > That's kind of confusing. Whatever is encoded in the CPU ID field, it
> > doesn't look like an actual CPUID number. Any idea?
> >
> > --
> > Jean Delvare
> > SUSE L3 Support