dmidecode-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH] Missing comma in the dmi_slot_type()


From: lijiang
Subject: Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH] Missing comma in the dmi_slot_type()
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:57:23 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

Hi, Jean

Thanks for your comment.

在 2020年12月10日 17:59, Jean Delvare 写道:
> Hi Lianbo,
> 
> On Wed,  9 Dec 2020 22:01:16 +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
>> In the initialization of "type", a suspicious concatenated string
>> "PCI Express Mini 76-pinPCI Express 4 SFF-8639 (U.2)" is produced
>> due to a missing comma between lines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  dmidecode.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dmidecode.c b/dmidecode.c
>> index ac96395d42c3..f7bd48203409 100644
>> --- a/dmidecode.c
>> +++ b/dmidecode.c
>> @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static const char *dmi_slot_type(u8 code)
>>              "PCI Express 3 SFF-8639 (U.2)",
>>              "PCI Express Mini 52-pin with bottom-side keep-outs",
>>              "PCI Express Mini 52-pin without bottom-side keep-outs",
>> -            "PCI Express Mini 76-pin"
>> +            "PCI Express Mini 76-pin",
>>              "PCI Express 4 SFF-8639 (U.2)",
>>              "PCI Express 5 SFF-8639 (U.2)",
>>              "OCP NIC 3.0 Small Form Factor (SFF)",
> 
> Good catch, thanks for reporting. I have a script which I run on the
> source code once in a while to spot array overruns, I added a check for
That's true.

> this case so that it gets caught faster if it happens again. Running it
Good to know.

> on the latest version of dmidecode.c revealed another similar case (in
> dmi_processor_characteristics) which I'll fix together with your
> finding.
> 
Good findings. I have seen your fix in the master branch. Thanks.

Lianbo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]