discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brutal review…


From: Andreas Fink
Subject: Re: Brutal review…
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:29:36 +0100

consensus on how official packages should be built. descriptions etc. and ill set aside a repo for it. it can also host apps etc but that has to be built by someone else

--
Sent from Canary

On Mittwoch, Okt. 18, 2023 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Boyd <danieljboyd@icloud.com> wrote:
That’s awesome—let me know if I you can use any help

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 18, 2023, at 09:05, Andreas Fink <afink@list.fink.org> wrote:




--
Sent from Canary


i do that already. I volunteer to host an official one. I run a ISP Backbone across Europe and Africa with multiple 100G links so Im ready for a lot of downloads :-).
I usually build into /usr/local for my own use. Im not sure how the old packages where built. But i would be ready to rebuild the "official way with clang /ARC support etc. My personal use is mainly gnustep-base for my ulib project as my apps dont need a desktop gui. But i usually build / package gui/back as well.

Debian12 on amd64 and arm64 is what I build regularly. arm32bit for Raspberry Pi as well but thats on Debian 10 (and takes forever to build). Risc-V i tried but failed due to missing clang (would have to build that from source which takes forever). But hopefully we will get there eventually.

So once we decide the parameters and build structure we want, we can make it happen.


On Mittwoch, Okt. 18, 2023 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Boyd <danieljboyd@icloud.com> wrote:


I haven't followed all discussions but if there is someone who sets up a private debian repository for all gnustep related packages and maintains it, everyone could contribute. And it just needs an additional entry in /etc/apt/sources.list or a file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]