Re: QAM constellation script

[Adrian Musceac]

Sorry,, I meant to send the previous email to the list.

On Thursday, 4 May 2023 13:01:10 EEST Marcus Müller wrote:

> Because you intuitively would start with a single symbol and multiply it
> with the *whole* sequence. What George's code does is different: It takes
> each sample of the audio signal and multiplies it with a corresponding
> random sample.
> 

I understand now. I wouldn't use a random number generator for this. Still, 
pretty interesting. Tough I can foresee objections from narrow-band users of 
QO100 :)

Cheers,
Adrian