discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: AW: AW: USRP, GPIO toggling and Gnuradio


From: Dobler, Anton
Subject: AW: AW: AW: USRP, GPIO toggling and Gnuradio
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:37:58 +0000

Thank you for that explanation! Does the transaction regarding the GPIO states use the SFP+ ports or the management connection? 


I will go for the raw c++ application and come back to the list ASAP.


Thank you all for your answers!



Von: Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. September 2021 18:59
An: Dobler, Anton; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: USRP, GPIO toggling and Gnuradio
 
On 2021-09-10 12:08 p.m., Dobler, Anton wrote:

Is there any alternative to the standard GPIO UHD interface, that allows me the desired speed and is this issue I see related to gnuradio and its scheduler or rather to the UHD API for the GPIOs?


BR,


Anton​

Every GPIO state transition requires a transaction across your network interface, and then into the FPGA GPIO logic.  That's the absolute upper limit on
  toggling the GPIOs from the host.

You can test how fast you can make this go with a "raw" UHD C++ program.  Once you've established how fast it can potentially go, then you start
  evaluating how to approach this latency with GR.  Right now, the waters are very muddy, and I am not the one to comment on GR latencies, etc.




Von: Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. September 2021 18:04
An: Dobler, Anton; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: AW: USRP, GPIO toggling and Gnuradio
 
On 2021-09-10 11:54 a.m., Dobler, Anton wrote:

I am extracting the package rate of a receive signal using a rather complex GRC flowgraph, i.e. I am detecting the preamble of a receive signal and generate a clock from here. This clock signal period is within the range of 100us - 1ms.
Toggling GPIOs using the standard GPIO interface for signals this fast is likely not going to be very speedy.

The GR experts will have to answer your other questions.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]