[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth
From: |
Alex Queiroz |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:39:27 +0200 |
Hallo,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Alex Shinn <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I disagree - I think a stack grown too large is likely indicative
> of a programming error, or at the very least an inefficient
> algorithm. In the general case I want my programs to be
> able to allocate as much heap as possible, but have a
> separate limitation on the stack.
>
Programming errors or inefficient algorithms should crash C programs,
not Scheme programs.
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/
- [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Marc Feeley, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, John Cowan, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Marc Feeley, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Felix, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Marc Feeley, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Alex Shinn, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Matthew Flatt, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, John Cowan, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Alex Shinn, 2012/07/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, cjtenny, 2012/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth,
Alex Queiroz <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Alex Shinn, 2012/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Alex Queiroz, 2012/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Alex Shinn, 2012/07/12
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Marc Feeley, 2012/07/11
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Shiro Kawai, 2012/07/11
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Jim Ursetto, 2012/07/11
Re: [Chicken-users] Unbounded stack growth, Felix, 2012/07/11