[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings
From: |
Tobia Conforto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:58:49 +0200 |
Alex Shinn wrote:
If Chicken switches to irregex, then we can just use SREs and be rid
of the ugliness of regex syntax forever.
It does look more "scalable" a syntax, if not less ugly...
(word (+ (| alphanum (".-_%")))
"@"
(+ (| alphanum (".-")))
"."
(** 2 4 alpha))
vs.
/address@hidden,4}\b/
A few months ago, Felix wrote:
using irregex is really an option, but both performance and
stability has to be evaluated thoroughly before committing to such a
decision.
Has anybody made a stability, correctness and performance comparison
of irregex-on-Chicken versus other implementations yet? I can do
that, if there's a need.
Tobia
PS: Forgive me an OT question. I've just switched to a Gmail account,
but still I use a standalone mail client. Does anybody know how to
get one's own posts to mailing lists back as incoming mail?
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Tobia Conforto, 2008/10/10