|
From: | Vincent Manis |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one |
Date: | Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:12:12 -0700 |
On 2008-Aug-7, at 19:53, John Cowan wrote:
1) Run it in a separate process, which you can kill without damaging yourself.2) Use a modified version of "eval" to execute it that counts ticks.
3) Use a modified version of eval that polls for a thread termination request.
I'd actually go along with John's suggestion to flush thread- terminate!, for the reasons already cited. At that point, we could no longer claim SRFI-18 compliance, but that's a very small price to pay. Just rename the unit `threads' or something. Maybe this is a change that can be made at Version 4?
-- v
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |