Re: [Chicken-users] require-extension and the compiler

[felix winkelmann]

On 9/27/05, Shawn Rutledge <address@hidden> wrote:

> > To have a fully compiled, custom interpreter with non-standard
> > syntax, put
> >
> > (declare (run-time-macros))
> > (include "chicken-more-macros")
>
> This seems to work, thanks.  What are the disadvantages of doing it
> this way as opposed to running it in csi?

None, in fact I would prefer csi. What you get is a self-contained
executable, though.


cheers,
felix