[Chicken-users] Strange hash-table behavior in compiled code

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

Hello

I'm confused about the behavior of hash tables in compiled code.

$ cat ht.scm
(let ((ht (make-hash-table string=?)))
  (hash-table-set! ht "a" "b")
  (print (hash-table-ref ht "a")))

$ csi -script ht.scm
b

$ csc -s ht.scm
$ csi -n       
  _______   _     __          
 / ___/ /  (_)___/ /_____ ___ 
/ /__/ _ \/ / __/  '_/ -_) _ \
\___/_//_/_/\__/_/\_\\__/_//_/

Version 2, Build 106 - linux-unix-gnu-unknown - [ dload ]
(c)2000-2005 Felix L. Winkelmann
#;1> (use ht)
; loading ./ht.so ...
#f

$ uname -a
Linux mandolate 2.6.11.7 #1 Sat Apr 9 21:34:07 GMT 2005 ppc 745/755 
PowerBook4,1 GNU/Linux


I checked the behavior on an older Chicken version and got the expected
result:


$ csi -script ht.scm 
b

$ csi
   ________    _      __            
  / ____/ /_  (_)____/ /_____  ____ 
 / /   / __ \/ / ___/ //_/ _ \/ __ \
/ /___/ / / / / /__/ ,< /  __/ / / /
\____/_/ /_/_/\___/_/|_|\___/_/ /_/ 
                                    
Version 1, Build 63 - linux-unix-gnu-x86
(c)2000-2004 Felix L. Winkelmann
#;> (use ht)
; loading ./ht.so ...
b

$ uname -a
Linux azile 2.6.10-5-386 #1 Tue Apr 5 12:12:40 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux


Is there something I'm missing?  If you need more information about the
environment, let me know.


Best wishes.
Mario