[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] plain lambdas as syntax transformers
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] plain lambdas as syntax transformers |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2013 13:05:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:49:43PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> > It makes it harder to explain what exactly er-macro-transformer does
> > (ie, nothing?).
>
> I'm unable to see the problem with implicitly wrapping an
> er-macro-transformer around a given lambda. That's fairly easy to
> understand.
True. Like I mentioned in my first mail, I don't see much problems
with it. And I'm also tired of arguing.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
Re: [Chicken-hackers] plain lambdas as syntax transformers, John Cowan, 2013/05/13