[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string->number shouldn't raise errors but
|
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string->number shouldn't raise errors but return #f on failure |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:22:31 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi Peter,
I have pushed your patch and dropped the C_i_ prefix from the
internal helper procedure as discussed on #chicken.
> PS: shouldn't C_i_finitep actually be called C_u_i_finitep?
> It's obviously unsafe (pass it any non-fixnum immediate and it'll
> probably blow up).
I think so too, this definitely belongs to another patch. Other
opinions?
Thanks,
Christian
--
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.