[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9
From: |
Thomas Schmitt |
Subject: |
[Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:07 +0100 |
Hi,
> BTW, is it correct that 1.0.0 has this in configure.ac?
> BURN_MAJOR_VERSION=1
> BURN_MINOR_VERSION=0
> BURN_MICRO_VERSION=1
Yes. The included libburn is a stable development snapshot.
This is a consequence of the relation of libburnia project and
GNU xorriso. The latter contains copies of libburn and libisofs
which are made from my development tree immediately after the
libraries had their releases.
xorriso -version
is supposed to report these versions:
xorriso version : 1.0.0
libisofs in use : 1.0.1 (min. 1.0.1)
libjte in use : 0.1.1 (min. 0.1.1)
libburn in use : 1.0.1 (min. 1.0.1)
libisoburn in use : 1.0.0 (min. 1.0.0)
> > The function in libisofs/util.c looks somewhat like a workaround
> > for a missing system function.
> You mean timegm?
My Linux has a man page for timegm with an example that
looks much like Vreixo's function:
"For a portable version of timegm(), set the TZ environment variable to
UTC, call mktime() and restore the value of TZ."
Well, it's not as portable as believed. :))
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
- [Bug-xorriso] -reply:<address@hidden>, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/01/17
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: -reply:<address@hidden>, Dagobert Michelsen, 2011/01/17
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/01/18
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Dagobert Michelsen, 2011/01/18
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/01/18
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/01/18
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Dagobert Michelsen, 2011/01/18
- [Bug-xorriso] Re: Portability issues of xorriso on Solaris 9, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/01/18