[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:35:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Thomas Schwinge, on Mon 06 Jun 2016 13:29:10 +0200, wrote:
> > > I don't enough to be sure, but isn't that the typical work of
> > > LocalitySanitizer, precisely?
> >
> > Could be! I’m not familiar with it.
>
> There is no LocalitySanitizer in GCC/LLVM. ;-)
Oops, sorry, I meant LeakSanitizer.
Samuel
- RFC: Runtime checking of port handling, Justus Winter, 2016/06/04
- [PATCH hurd 1/2] xxx print fail, Justus Winter, 2016/06/04
- [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Justus Winter, 2016/06/04
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/05
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Samuel Thibault, 2016/06/05
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/06
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Thomas Schwinge, 2016/06/06
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [PATCH hurd 2/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add safe port handling macros, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/06
Re: [PATCH hurd 1/2] xxx print fail, Samuel Thibault, 2016/06/04
Re: RFC: Runtime checking of port handling, Samuel Thibault, 2016/06/04