bug#62656: broken guix time-machine + software-heritage

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Tue, 02 May 2023 at 09:42, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> 
> wrote:
>
>>> Somehow, we could tweak ’clone-from-swh’ from (guix git) to use 'flat
>>> instead of 'git-bare.  However, I am unsure the other tweaks it would
>>> require since a Git repository is somehow expected.
>>
>> Yeah, ‘clone-from-swh’ is really cloning, so it needs ‘git-bare’.
>> Generally, in the case of channels, we need a full clone, not just a
>> revision.  Various bits of the machinery expect the clone: (guix
>> describe), (guix channels), and so on.
>
> Even if the bug on SWH would be fixed, at the rate the Guix repo is
> growing, it would be impractical to cook the whole Guix repo.

Falling back to SWH to fetch channels is something we expect to be rare,
though.

> And it appears to me weird when we, most of the time, need a very
> restricted set of commits.
>
> We could imagine to locally create a new repo (git init) and only add
> the content of the commit specified by “guix time-machine”.

To do that we’d need to say goodbye to the features I mentioned above.

> PS: Just some numbers backing the rate of growing:
>
>         $ git log --oneline | wc -l
>         114457
>
>         $ git log --oneline --before=2019-05-01 | wc -l
>         43845
>
>         $ git log --oneline --after=2019-05-01 | wc -l
>         70612
>
>
>  1. We are cooking 43845 commits of the history that are useless because
>     unreachable with the time-machine.  They pre-date the introduction
>     of the inferiors – yes, we could refine and consider v0.15 instead
>     of v1.0.0. :-)
>
>  2. The first commit is from 2012.  Over the first 7 years, 38% of the
>     history had been produced.  In less than 4 years, we have produced
>     62% of the history!  Yeah, that’s cool!
>
>     Basically, from now to less than 5 years, we will generate the same
>     number of commits as over the past 10 years.

Heh, insightful figures!

Ludo’.