[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base langu
From: |
Josselin Poiret |
Subject: |
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:35:54 +0200 |
Hi Skyler,
Skyler <skyvine@protonmail.com> writes:
> Is there a normal timeline for patch review or is it mor of an "as resources
> allow" type of deal?
Unfortunately no, there are no guarantees: someone needs to take some
time to look at this, and we can't force anyone to do it. The fact that
it's in a bug report instead of a patch submission probably doesn't
help, let me see if I can fix this with a debbugs command.
Best,
--
Josselin Poiret
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Prev by Date:
bug#62784: drascula, lure, lure-de, lure-es, lure-fr, lure-it, sky: non-commercial license
- Next by Date:
bug#62784: drascula, lure, lure-de, lure-es, lure-fr, lure-it, sky: non-commercial license
- Previous by thread:
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
- Next by thread:
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
- Index(es):