bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#52044: Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized


From: Jaft
Subject: bug#52044: Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:16:05 +0000 (UTC)

> Am Donnerstag, den 02.12.2021, 02:10 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> > I had noticed that the core-updates-frozen branch had been merged so
> > I upgraded but found things pretty much the same as before.
> Please come back, you're within the wrong timeline.

Oh, I don't mean that I used another branch; I saw it got merged to master (I 
believe) so I just did a guix pull and then guix upgrade. I'm still using 
stable. Sorry about the confusion!

> > I saw an old patch (
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=e311ef4f87f7ad8db2114e5f89961eea0240893b
> > ) and, while I'd checked rofi for gdk-pixbuf+svg – before –, –
> > somehow – it made me think to check librsvg, this time, and found
> > that it was using gdk-pixbuf, rather than gdk-pixbuf+svg. I then made
> > a package inheriting librsvg but using gdk-pixbuf+svg, instead, and
> > made a package which inherited rofi but used my librsvg package and,
> > with that installed, rofi worked with .svgs, then.
> > 
> > Am I right in assuming librsvg ought to be using the latter, as the
> > library deals directly with handling SVGs? If so, I can put together
> > a patch to submit.
> Have you checked using gdk-pixbuf+svg as input to rofi directly?  I
> don't see why we would have to go in circles for librsvg, the component
> you're trying to use is gdk-pixbuf.

I just checked and it does; I was going off of the package formation in Guix 
but, checking the listed dependencies on the rofi GitHub page 
(https://github.com/davatorium/rofi/blob/next/INSTALL.md#external-libraries), 
it does list gdk-pixbuf as one so, perhaps, it makes more sense to build with 
that instead of librsvg.

I had assumed the package inputs for rofi were already accurate and, if 
gdk-pixbuf doesn't have SVG support while gdk-pixbuf+svg does, it seemed 
plausible that gdk-pixbuf+svg would be the preferred package for librsvg as 
librsvg is dealing with SVGs, perhaps part of the reason for SVG icons not 
getting rendered in applications like Thunar, XFCE, etc. (that being said, I'm 
unfamiliar with the librsvg code so, perhaps, this assumption of how the 
gdk-pixbuf dependency is being used is incorrect, on my part).

In any case, librsvg is not listed as a dependency for rofi while gdk-pixbuf is 
and swapping librsvg for gdk-pixbuf+svg in the rofi package still seemed to 
build it alright (and render SVGs) so, at least directly for rofi, directly 
using dgk-pixbuf+svg would still solve the SVG issue for it.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]