bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#41715: The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' faile


From: o . rojon
Subject: bug#41715: The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for guix
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:26:00 +0200
User-agent: Posteo Webmail

Just to follow up: a roll-back does NOT solve the issue.

What I have tried:
1) roll-back via guix system roll-back (to the generation that was created upon system installation)
2) roll-back via guix package --roll-back (same)
3) (1) + (2) combined
4) boot into the generation created upon system installation.

In none of these cases was I able to run 'guix pull'.

Does it help for you to see my system configuration file? Because there isnt much in there apart from very basic packages (ncdu, recutils, some fonts, some icon packs) and a few services (GDM->SDDM login manager, MATE desktop, TOR). Also note that before the re-installation, I have not experienced problems with this configuration (MINUS mate desktop and TOR).

On 04.06.2020 22:00, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello,

o.rojon@posteo.net skribis:

on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the
following error:
# guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
# failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
# host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
pull-version: 1).

Is there more info above these lines?

I tried to reproduce it with:

  guix time-machine --commit=398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080 \
    -- time-machine --commit=790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf \
    -- describe

but it works for me.

I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been
mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do
have 24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be
totally unrelated.

24 GiB is more than enough.

Is the problem reproducible if you try again now?

Thanks for reporting the issue,
Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]