bug-groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #66081] [troff] possible use of uninitialized stack memory


From: G. Branden Robinson
Subject: [bug #66081] [troff] possible use of uninitialized stack memory
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 13:26:04 -0400 (EDT)

Update of bug #66081 (group groff):

                  Status:             In Progress => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 
         Planned Release:                    None => 1.24.0                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #1:

Hi Lukas,

I goofed the commit message on this one, and forgot to mark you as the author.
 Sorry about that.

The ChangeLog is correct.  Also, I altered the patch anyway, to use a
C++98-compatible form of
initialization--[https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/history direct
initialization didn't come into the language standard until C++03].


commit c77f59e32339183d887300e3198707e4e4ad06dc
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 14 15:25:00 2024 -0500

    [troff]: Fix Savannah #66081.
    
    * src/roff/troff/env.cpp (override_sizes): Zero out heap-allocated
      memory prior to use.  If `strtok()` returns a null pointer, we break
      early from the `for` loop before populating it.  The only other case
      where we break out of the loop is when `lower` is 0, and we do only
      after adding this 0 to `sizes`.  Since this memory is then passed to
      `font_size::init_size_table()`, which uses a zero integer to detect
      the end of the list, we could then access uninitialized memory.  [The
      user is not required to supply a zero argument to the `sizes` request.
      I also revised the patch to use memset(3) instead of (an empty) value
      initializer, which is a C++03 feature.  --GBR]
    
    Fixes <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66081>.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66081>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]