[bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf

[Bertrand Garrigues]

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #50989 (project groff):

Deri,

I've made a second version of your patch `bug-50989-v2.patch' as the one you
posted can no longer be applied on master.  All the tests are OK on my side. 
File `typesetting.pdf' is now correctly generated.  I've also used two files
(see attachments) `basic_fonts.tr' and `urw_fonts.tr' that use all available
fonts; without your patch lots of the fonts of basic_fonts.tr cannot be used,
and the problem is well fixed with your patch. I've tested with ghostscript
9.21 and also made non-regression tests with the old fonts installed by older
version of ghostscript.

So you can commit on master the patch, unless you saw some other problems.

I think you should also commit CheckType1.pl as it's a usefull tool.  I would
also like to commit `basic_fonts.tr' and `urw_fonts.tr' (in font/devpdf) if
you agree.  It would be better to have a way to automatically check the output
of these files and add the test into `make check' but I know no easy way to
check a pdf.


(file #41568, file #41569, file #41570)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: bug-50989-v2.patch             Size:4 KB
File name: basic_fonts.tr                 Size:1 KB
File name: urw_fonts.tr                   Size:1 KB


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50989>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/