[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf
From: |
Deri James |
Subject: |
[bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2017 17:07:22 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #50989 (project groff):
This is a strange one. Type 1 fonts come in two flavours which handle the
binary part of the font differently. .pfa uses hex encoded ascii, and .pfb has
raw binary. The way to differentiate is that a .pfb file is meant to have six
bytes of binary data on the front of the file which define the length of the
first block. The new CenturySchoolbook fonts from ghostscript are raw binary
but do not have this binary header.
So the problem is in gropdf, I'm working on a solution. :-)
Cheers
Deri
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50989>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Bertrand Garrigues, 2017/05/09
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Bertrand Garrigues, 2017/05/10
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Bertrand Garrigues, 2017/05/10
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf,
Deri James <=
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Deri James, 2017/05/11
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/05/11
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Deri James, 2017/05/11
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/05/11
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Bertrand Garrigues, 2017/05/14
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Deri James, 2017/05/14
- [bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/05/14