Re: .substring bug - indicies don't work as documented(?)

[Werner LEMBERG]

> No objection to changing it from here, but I'm not sure what it would
> be changed to.

Here is the documentation of `substring' in Elisp.

 - Function: substring string start &optional end
     This function returns a new string which consists of those
     characters from STRING in the range from (and including) the
     character at the index START up to (but excluding) the character
     at the index END.  The first character is at index zero.

          (substring "abcdefg" 0 3)
               => "abc"

     Here the index for `a' is 0, the index for `b' is 1, and the index
     for `c' is 2.  Thus, three letters, `abc', are copied from the
     string `"abcdefg"'.  The index 3 marks the character position up
     to which the substring is copied.  The character whose index is 3
     is actually the fourth character in the string.

     A negative number counts from the end of the string, so that -1
     signifies the index of the last character of the string.  For
     example:

          (substring "abcdefg" -3 -1)
               => "ef"

     In this example, the index for `e' is -3, the index for `f' is -2,
     and the index for `g' is -1.  Therefore, `e' and `f' are included,
     and `g' is excluded.

     When `nil' is used as an index, it stands for the length of the
     string.  Thus,

          (substring "abcdefg" -3 nil)
               => "efg"

     Omitting the argument END is equivalent to specifying `nil'.  It
     follows that `(substring STRING 0)' returns a copy of all of
     STRING.

          (substring "abcdefg" 0)
               => "abcdefg"



  Werner