Re: [bug #26437] Base should allow the usual "make && sudo make install"

[Nicola Pero]

On 3 Oct 2009, at 23:20, Markus Hitter wrote:

> > Having just gnustep-config in the PATH is pretty useless ... I mean  
> > when
> > users install Gorm, how are they going to run it if the Gorm  
> > executable is not
> > in the PATH ?
>
> Well, either by typing "Gorm" in a terminal or by selecting Gorm  
> from the application menu.
>
> For the former, there's a link installed by the package:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/bin/Gorm
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 mah mah 41 2009-10-04 00:01 /usr/bin/Gorm -> ../lib/ 
> GNUstep/Applications/Gorm.app/Gorm


Sounds good.  :-)

So, if GNUstep executables are found because packages are expected to  
add symlinks to them from /usr/bin,
why the gnustep-make package isn't creating the symlink from /usr/bin/ 
gnustep-config to wherever gnustep-config is ?
It sounds like a bug in the gnustep-make package then which is failing  
to create the symlink. ;-)

Thanks