[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Strange position
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Strange position |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:19:45 -0000 |
Hi Peter,
I think this is quite common. It's easy to find bearoff positions where
this is the case.
GNU Backgammon Position ID: CQAAEAEAAAAAAA
Match ID : cAkFAAAAAAAA
+24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+ O: O
OOO | O O | | | 0 points
OOO | | | |
OOO | | | |
OO | | | |
OO | | | |
| |BAR| |v (Cube: 1)
XX | | | |
XX | | | |
XXX | | | |
XXX | | | | Rolled 21
XXX | X X | | | 0 points
+-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+ X: X
Cube analysis
4-ply cubeless equity +0.108
0.554 0.000 0.000 - 0.446 0.000 0.000
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, take +0.111
2. Double, pass +1.000 ( +0.889)
3. No double +0.056 ( -0.056)
Proper cube action: Double, take
X should double and O should take.
If X fails to bear off both men, 0 should re-double and X should pass.
GNU Backgammon Position ID: AQAAJAAAAAAAAA
Match ID : AQEAAAAAAAAA
+-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+ O: O (Cube: 2)
OOO | O O | | | 0 points
OOO | | | | On roll
OOO | | | |
OO | | | |
OO | | | |
| |BAR| |^
XX | | | |
XXX | | | |
XXX | | | |
XXX | | | |
XXX | X | | | 0 points
+24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+ X: X
Cube analysis
2-ply cubeless equity +0.889
0.944 0.000 0.000 - 0.056 0.000 0.000
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, pass +1.000
2. Double, take +1.778 ( +0.778)
3. No double +0.889 ( -0.111)
Proper cube action: Redouble, pass
Regards,
Ian Shaw
________________________________
From: Peter Nikolov
Sent: 11 February 2011 10:55
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Strange position
I wonder for the existence of any particular position(s), when
it is correct:
1. Player X to double, and player Y to take it.
Player X rolls next. Then, it is correct again:
2. Player Y to re-double, then player X to pass.
(If exists, most probably after step 1 X did play the worst
possible moves with the worst possible rolls. Obviously if X played the
best possible moves with the best possible rolls, then player Y must not
redouble! What about if X played the best with the worst dices?)