Re: [Bug-gnubg] Is GNU Backgammon ready for GTK+ 3 ?

[Christian Anthon]

I assume that the menus will be the main issue, but I haven't followed
the GTK3 development.

Christian.

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Michael Petch <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Øystein,
>
> I was going send an email to this list about it as well (Possible movement
> to GTK3). I did a -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED (but not -DGSEAL_ENABLE) a few
> months back and had noted that we were using a number of deprecated
> functions but it didn't appear to be something that would have bee
> substantially bad that would require a large development effort. As for
> -DGSEAL_ENABLE I can't say I have.
>
> Any concerns about GTK+3 on Windows? Maybe there are none, but things seem
> to be more finicky on that platform.
>
> Michael
>
> On 01/02/2011 2:50 PM, Øystein Schønning-Johansen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As GTK+3 is right around the corner, and this will remove old deprecated API
> from the GTK+ 2.x series, it would be nice if we where a little prepared for
> this.
>
> I guess we have some deprecated API calls left in the code, don't we?
>
> Has anyone tried building with -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED and -DGSEAL_ENABLE ?
>
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.99/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
>
> -Øystein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>
>