|
From: | Jonathan Kinsey |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Removal of non-threaded code |
Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:43:09 +0000 |
I'm definitely for removing the non-threaded code. Personally I would just have threaded code - are there any systems which don't support threads? Ideally someone could run some tests on a single core machine to see how much slower the threaded code is (with one thread) compared to the single-threaded code. My guess is a couple of percent, but that is a guess. Jon Christian Anthon wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm considering to remove the non-threaded code. The threaded code > should be able to run without threads with minor adjustments (replacing > thread-safe operations with equivalent unsafe ones or NULL operations as > appropriate), and we wouldn't have two sets of code to keep working at > the same time. There may still be a small time-penalty involved. Anybody > with a strong opinion against this? > > Christian. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > address@hidden > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg Surfing the web just got more rewarding. Download the New Internet Explorer 8 |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |