[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnu-libiconv] [PATCH] armscii8 bugfix
From: |
Gayane Sargssian |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnu-libiconv] [PATCH] armscii8 bugfix |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:43:07 +0500 |
User-agent: |
Freenet.am WebMail |
>Yes, when you post to the mailing list for the first time, there is a
>delay, because of the spam filter.
I'm, unfortunately, new to mailing lists, please let me know if/when I do
something wrong.
>I can give only a small weight to a font, compared to a standard if that is
>available. Also note that this font is from 1994, whereas the AST 34.002
>standard is from 1997. So this font cannot really be authoritative.
I must agree.
>With the two <quote>s in there, it is not clear what to do with this
>character.
>The description as rotating petals sounds like one should leave it unmapped
>(because there is no corresponding Unicode character), whereas the
>description
>as "This symbol has neither functional nor any other meaning in the coding
>table except that it begins the Armenian character set" sounds like it
should
>be dropped during conversion.
>Unless you show me some web sites that use this character, I would prefer
>to leave it as is: unmapped.
Being Armenian, I have never seen that symbol in use in internet in the
texts, it is an "ancient symbol". I could find some information in the
internet: [1], [2].
[2] Says: "All variations of the very popular, almost national, Armenian
symbol of eternity found practically on every decorative church relief
and Khatchqar".
But ahead of the fact that the symbol is missing from Unicode, I agree to
leave it unmapped for now.
>This copy is from May 1998. In 2002, I downloaded a newer version of this
>text, from June 1999, from <http://www.freenet.am/armscii/armcs-006.html>.
>Find it attached.
Thank you, I searched the net for the filename and found the new address
of the document(s), see [3], [4].
>Maybe it was not so frequently used, because people did not use this
>ligature?
No, as [4] says, "armew is a "ligature symbol" rather than a ligature".
It _is_ used frequently, "ew" means "and", and we use it not only as a
ligature as in M&Ms but mainly as one of two forms (see section 2.3 in
[4]) of writing "and" anywhere in the middle of the sentence. In
handwriting the "ew" is the _only_ way of writing "and", except when "And"
is written as the first word in the sentence (that is, beginning with Big
sign), when we write Big "E" and small "w" as separate symbols.
>Conclusion: libiconv's conversion is exactly as it should be.
>Nothing should change.
According to the standards, yes, you are right.
>Btw:
>[3] is interesting. The section 2.2. could be used to improve the
>LC_COLLATE
>section of the hy_AM locale in glibc. Are you familiar with sorting (in
>lists
>and dictionaries) in Armenian? Would you like to work with me on putting
>proper
>Armenian sorting into glibc?
Yes of course, I will be glad to cooperate.
Thank you.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternity
[2] http://www.hossank.com/forum/showthread.php?p=47
[3] http://www.melikyan.com/armscii/
[4] http://www.melikyan.com/armscii/armcs-006.html
-----------------------------------------
This email was sent using Freenet.am WebMail.
Welcome to Armenian Freenet Community!
http://freenet.am/