From: Stefan Kangas<stefankangas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:18:41 -0800
Cc:68246@debbugs.gnu.org,casouri@gmail.com,joaotavora@gmail.com
Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Please don't call it "language". That'd be confusing. LSP is about
programming languages, so "language" is natural there. But in Emacs,
a major mode is more general than that. For example, it is not
unthinkable to consider mail-mode to be the extra-parent of
message-mode (or vice versa) -- but what is the "language" in that
case?
Isn't the language for such modes in this paradigm just the empty set?