bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#67976: java-ts-mode test failure


From: Theodor Thornhill
Subject: bug#67976: java-ts-mode test failure
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:00:00 +0100

Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:

> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> On Dec 22, 2023, at 1:09 PM, john muhl via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the 
>>> Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:

[...]

>>>     ("Mismatch in test \"Statements\", file 
>>> /home/build/emacs/test/lisp/progmodes/java-ts-mode-resources/indent.erts"
>>>      #(
>>> "if (x) {\n    for (var foo : foos) {\n        \n    }\n} else if (y) 
>>> {\n\11for (int i = 0; x < foos.size(); i++) {\n            return;\n\11}\n  
>>>   } else {\n\11return;\n    }\n"
>>> 0 159 (fontified nil))
>>>    "if (x) {\n    for (var foo : foos) {\n        \n    }\n} else if (y) 
>>> {\n    for (int i = 0; x < foos.size(); i++) {\n        return;\n    }\n} 
>>> else {\n    return;\n}\n"))
>>>   FAILED  1/2  java-ts-mode-test-indentation (0.010839 sec) at 
>>> emacs/test/lisp/progmodes/java-ts-mode-tests.el:26
>>>   passed  2/2  java-ts-mode-test-movement (0.004179 sec)
>>> 
>>> Ran 2 tests, 1 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2023-12-22 19:05:47+0000, 
>>> 0.134714 sec)
>>> 
>
> Thanks, I'll look at it!
>
> Theo
>

So I understand the bug now, and it seems you're right in that commit
being the offender. I'll see if I can rewrite the matchers to skip the
assumption that no longer works. It looks a little like a "rewrite" of
the indentation, though, so I need some time to do it correctly.

Theo





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]