bug#67061: [PATCH] Improve syntax highlighting for python-ts-mode

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 17/12/2023 03:07, Yuan Fu wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2023, at 3:51 AM, Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>  wrote:
> >
> > On 14/12/2023 07:54, Yuan Fu wrote:
> > > > I think the 'definition' feature is good for it (going by the name, since it's 
> > > > an implicit variable declaration), but it could be split off into a separate 
> > > > feature too.
> > > As long as it’s not added to the definition feature, because, again, definition 
> > > is at level 1 and I don’t want to keep level 1 minimal.
> > > Maybe we can use local-definition, or something similar, to signify that this 
> > > feature highlights scoped definitions.
> > But you think function parameters should be in 'definition'? They are also 
> > "scoped", I would say.
> I don’t think function parameters should be in ‘definition’. In fact, in my 
> head, only the variable/function/class name of top-level constructs should be 
> in ‘definition’. Now I can see that the name ‘definition’ is too vague for my 
> original intent, and most ts modes probably don’t share the same interpretation 
> as I do...
>
> Maybe we can allow definition to include more things and move it to level 3, 
> and add a more restricted ’top-level-definition’ to level 1 to take it’s 
> current role. WDYT?

What about a split like function-definition/variable-definition? Not all 
functions are top-level. But there are also classes...

Or the features could just be called 'definition' and 
'variable-definition', and that the former only contains functions and 
classes might simply be implied by the existence of the latter.