[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66867: lexical binding?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#66867: lexical binding? |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Nov 2023 15:35:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> maybe the Oclosure code should enforce lexical-binding, if it can, or
>> throw an informative error in the case it can't so enforce?
> Stefan M, what do you think?
A (cl-assert lexical-binding) in something like `oclosure--lambda`
sounds good, yes.
Stefan
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/01
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/01
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Greg Minshall, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/02
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/03
- bug#66867: lexical binding?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/11/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#66867: closed (Re: bug#66867: lexical binding?), Greg Minshall, 2023/11/06