[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19350: #19350 24.4; Incorrect quoting of %-signs for Windows command
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#19350: #19350 24.4; Incorrect quoting of %-signs for Windows command shell |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:17:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
close 19350
quit
Demi Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> writes:
> But yes, it would be great to just skip the shell. I don't think we
> should replace it either. Lisp should always pass an argument list
> when creating a process.
The manual's description of shell-quote-argument has meanwhile got a
cross-reference to `(elisp) Security Considerations'. I've added a
mention of this problem there, and an expected-to-fail test to make it
clear what the problem is. With that, I'll close the bug.
[1: 2dd273b985]: 2018-02-08 19:10:11 -0500
Mention that shell quoting of % on w32 may fail (Bug#19350)
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=2dd273b9853189f2105426cffa723ced7f329fb4
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#19350: #19350 24.4; Incorrect quoting of %-signs for Windows command shell,
Noam Postavsky <=