[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpre
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:43:40 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> I have no idea whether what the comment says about bootstrap is still
> true nowadays, since the bootstrap on Windows works differently. You
> can try removing those 2 files and see if that hurts anything.
After synching lisp/makefile.w32-in with Stefan's changes in
revno:88864, emacs bootstraps just fine.
I haven't tried to evaluate any possible impact in byte-compilation
time, given its current state.
Juanma
=== modified file 'lisp/makefile.w32-in'
--- lisp/makefile.w32-in 2012-06-14 23:53:41 +0000
+++ lisp/makefile.w32-in 2012-06-15 19:39:42 +0000
@@ -76,18 +76,14 @@
BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS = $(BIG_STACK_OPTS) $(BYTE_COMPILE_EXTRA_FLAGS)
# Files to compile before others during a bootstrap. This is done to
-# speed up the bootstrap process. The CC files are compiled first
-# because CC mode tweaks the compilation process, and requiring
-# cc-mode when it is not compiled doesn't work during the
-# bootstrapping.
+# speed up the bootstrap process.
COMPILE_FIRST = \
+ $(lisp)/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el \
$(lisp)/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el \
- $(lisp)/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el \
$(lisp)/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el \
$(lisp)/emacs-lisp/cconv.el \
- $(lisp)/progmodes/cc-mode.el \
- $(lisp)/progmodes/cc-vars.el
+ $(lisp)/emacs-lisp/autoload.el
# The actual Emacs command run in the targets below.
# The quotes around $(EMACS) are here because the user could type
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, (continued)
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/09
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/09
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/10
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/10
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/11
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/15
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/15
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/20
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/20
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/22
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Glenn Morris, 2012/06/24