[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Bill Richter |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
12 Aug 2001 15:04:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 |
>>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
RMS> But since [Glickstein's proprietary Emacs book] is not free,
RMS> please don't mention its existence to anyone. The way to
RMS> encourage free documentation is by showing that non-free
RMS> documentation isn't good enough.
How can you show something "isn't good enough" if you don't ever
"mention its existence to anyone"?
Don't you have to say, Glickstein's proprietary Emacs book covers
topic xxx, but the Emacs Lisp reference manual does a better job with
it, or covers some topic yyy that Glickstein doesn't cover?
--
Bill <http://www.math.nwu.edu/~richter>
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Marcelo Dias de Toledo, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/11
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Bill Richter <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Stein A. Strømme, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Raymond Zeitler, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/16