[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2001 19:01:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 |
eliz@is.elta.co.il (Eli Zaretskii) writes:
> The issue here is that there's no such thing as "FSF Emacs". It's
> usually a term used by people who have derogatory attitude towards GNU
> Emacs; thus Richard's comment, especially since the rest of your message
> did sound quite angry.
I presume it was not meant that way. The OP didn't know that "FSF
Emacs" is derogatory, and didn't intend to put off anyone with his
(her?) wording.
kai
--
~/.signature: No such file or directory
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Tom Tromey, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Marcelo Dias de Toledo, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/11
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/12
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Stein A. Strømme, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Raymond Zeitler, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17