bug-gettext
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Bug#1031952: gettext: Missing source for an installed windows b


From: Santiago Vila
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bug#1031952: gettext: Missing source for an installed windows binary
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:02:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0

El 26/2/23 a las 11:56, Bruno Haible escribió:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Summary: There is no source for gettext-tools/m4/csharpexec-test.exe.

Fixed through
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bda6586b87f7e258c16bd0dca5c43048b9920a9

Thanks a lot!

For completeness: Would it make sense to add an indication, somewhere, about 
the way
to create the .exe from the .cs? This is something that surely everybody using
mono knows, but I had to search for it. I guess this would be correct:

mcs -out:csharpexec-test.exe csharpexec-test.cs

I don't think a Makefile is required for that, but if it's done in a Makefile,
it would help if it's not triggered by automake maintainer's mode (not sure if
that's possible), as I'm currently running autoreconf and this would force me
to add an extra build-dependency just for a single file. Before doing that
I would probably stop including the .exe file in the gettext-doc.deb package.

(At this moment Debian bookworm is starting to freeze before becoming Debian 12)

Note: The Debian package disabled the mono stuff in version 0.17-7 (dated 
2009-08-17)

That's a pity. Isn't GNOME using C# [1], and also isn't it useful for building
mobile apps [2]?

I don't know. Nobody in Debian has asked me to restore mono support
since then, and the gettext package has become complex enough that
anybody interested would surely have to provide patches.

Thanks.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]