bug-gettext
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gettext] gettext 0.19.5 first release candidate


From: Chusslove Illich
Subject: Re: [bug-gettext] gettext 0.19.5 first release candidate
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:12:41 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.13-0.27-default; KDE/4.10.3; x86_64; ; )

> [: Dagobert Michelsen :]
>   FAIL: format-kde-kuit-1
>   =======================
>
>   Format string recognition error:
>   xi18n("<filename>a");
>   Got:
>   # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
>   # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
>   # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
>   # FIRST AUTHOR <address@hidden>, YEAR.
>   #
>   #, fuzzy
>   msgid ""
>   msgstr ""
>   "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
>   "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
>   "POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-23 12:19+0200\n"
>   "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
>   "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
>   "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
>   "Language: \n"
>   "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
>   "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
>   "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
>
>   #: f-kd-1-1.in:1
>   #, kde-kuit-format
>   msgid "<filename>a"
>   msgstr ""
>   FAIL format-kde-kuit-1 (exit status: 1)
>
>   FAIL: format-kde-kuit-2
>   =======================
>
>   Format string checking error:
>   #, kde-kuit-format
>   msgid "<filename>foo</filename>"
>   msgstr "<filename>bar"
>   FAIL format-kde-kuit-2 (exit status: 1)

These two failures I can reproduce if I force libexpat not to be found. Does
it make sense to skip these tests in case libexpat is missing? If yes,
something like this could be put at the top of
gettext-tools/tests/format-kde-kuit-* files:

  if grep -q "HAVE_LIBEXPAT *= *$" "${srcdir=.}/Makefile"; then
      echo "Skipping test: libexpat not available"
      exit 77
  fi

-- 
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]