bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/28415] stack-buffer-overflow in objdump at disassemble_byt


From: guillermo.e.martinez at oracle dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/28415] stack-buffer-overflow in objdump at disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:2905)
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 02:45:16 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28415

Guillermo E. Martinez <guillermo.e.martinez at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |guillermo.e.martinez@oracle
                   |                            |.com

--- Comment #1 from Guillermo E. Martinez <guillermo.e.martinez at oracle dot 
com> ---
Hello, 

This is happening because cache_bread_1 it's reading less bytes than expected
(3314/6144 in .xt.insn for "property xtensa section")

bfd/cache.c:cache_bread_1: 0xcf2 ()

So _bfd_generic_get_section_contents is returning *false* and propagated to
bfd_get_section_contents, bfd_get_full_section_contents,
bfd_malloc_and_get_section and finally retrieve_contents.

After that, *table_data* variable is not taking care of the return value for
retrieve_contents assuming valid bytes for such section, further used in
bfd_get_32:

bfd_vma address = bfd_get_32 (abfd, table_data + off); 

I thinks that it could be fixed as follow:

diff --git a/bfd/elf32-xtensa.c b/bfd/elf32-xtensa.c
index e5bfbb2f509..98039757c22 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-xtensa.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-xtensa.c
@@ -910,7 +910,14 @@ xtensa_read_table_entries (bfd *abfd,
     table_entry_size -= 4;

   num_records = table_size / table_entry_size;
+
   table_data = retrieve_contents (abfd, table_section, true);
+  if (table_data == 0)
+    {
+      *table_p = NULL;
+      return 0;
+    }
+
   blocks = (property_table_entry *)
     bfd_malloc (num_records * sizeof (property_table_entry));
   block_count = 0;

Please let me know your comments,

Kind regards,
Guillermo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]