[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Beaver-devel] Release Tarball
From: |
Leslie Polzer |
Subject: |
Re: [Beaver-devel] Release Tarball |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2003 10:46:56 +0200 |
On Mon, 26 May 2003 19:26:19 -0400
Michael Terry <address@hidden> wrote:
> Leslie Polzer wrote:
> > Should we include GtkSourceView in it?
>
> My gut reaction is no; it's a seperate library.
Seeing that it's about 2.5M I agree with you.
> Although, it's a reasonable thing to do. I do have misgivings about the
> gnome-friendliness of GtkSourceView's developers;
I feel this lib is not the right place for any GNOME stuff.
> I think one of them also works on GEdit.
Well, do you think this implies some kind of GNOME bias?
> I heard they plan to add support for gnome-print
> (for what purpose, I do not know). Now, gnome-print isn't terrible,
> since it's a fringe GNOME library that seems to only depend on GTK
> libraries. And presumably, it'll be optional (or we can provide a patch
> to make it optional). But, my point is that if the developers do
> something we don't like, it would be an option to fork gtksourceview and
> bundle it with us. I just don't think we need to take such drastic
> steps yet (it would be nontrivial effort without much reward).
Fully agreed.
Leslie