[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-NG] [FYI] [ng] tests: enhance spy tests on patter rules
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-NG] [FYI] [ng] tests: enhance spy tests on patter rules |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:47:36 +0200 |
Le 22 juil. 2012 à 09:50, Stefano Lattarini a écrit :
> On 07/22/2012 09:18 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>>
>> Le 22 juil. 2012 à 08:57, Stefano Lattarini a écrit :
>>
>>> +# Two check are done here:
>>
>> checks
>>
> Fixed.
>
>>> +# - if we have two pattern rules from which the same file (or set of
>>
>> s/we have // (th shrtr, th btr :).
>>
> But this would make the sentence grammatically incorrect, no? Maybe
> s/we have/there are/ instead?
the rules have to become the subject.
If two patterns rules from the which the same file
(of set of files) can be built, are both applicable, and
...
>>> +# files) can be built, both are applicable, and both results in the
>>> +# same target stem, then the first one wins.
>>> +# - if we have two pattern rules from which the same file (or set of
>>
>> ditto.
>>
> Likewise :-)
Similarly :P
>
>>> +# files) can be built, both are applicable, but the resulting target
>>> +# stems are different, then the "most specific" one (i.e., that which
>>> +# result in the shortest stem) is used.
>>> +# We take advantage of such features at least in our 'parallel-tests'
>>> +# support.