[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?
From: |
mituharu |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2016 21:03:07 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 |
> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> So they are always magnified and look blurry. This cannot be
>>>> solved at the Lisp level.
>>
>>> That does not make a lot of sense: preview-latex queries the
>>> resolution of the device and generates images matching the device
>>> resolution. If Retina displays are lying about their resolution,
>>> that is the problem to tackle.
>>
>> That's exactly what the OP tried and resulted in failure, i.e., large
>> blurry images. Just giving a large resolution value to Ghostscript at
>> the Lisp level might work on other platforms, but that is not enough
>> to display images in a non-blurry way on OS X Retina display.
>
> Getting the OS X Retina display to display one pixel per image pixel is
> not a new feature: fixing this (probably requires fixing in the Emacs
> source rather than in AUCTeX) to get the platform to behave like others
> is pretty uncontroversial. I see no non-technical roadblocks there.
What happens when a user moves an Emacs frame from a Retina
display to a non-Retina display? The window system on OS X keeps
the logical (point) size rather than the physical (pixel,
actually backing store) size.
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/GraphicsAnimation/Conceptual/HighResolutionOSX/Explained/Explained.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012302-CH4-SW1
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/05/17
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, Mosè Giordano, 2016/05/17
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?,
mituharu <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, Konstantinos Theofilis, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, Konstantinos Theofilis, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, David Kastrup, 2016/05/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] Embedded previews in high-DPI?, Mosè Giordano, 2016/05/19