Re: Fontification of \include

[Ikumi Keita]

Hi Arash,

>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi all,
> I was wondering why \include is fontified like this:

I wonder, too.

> In font-latex.el, there is one entry for "include" in the warning[1] and
> one in the reference keyword-class[2].

> Is this what we want?  I suggest to remove the first entry and fontify
> \include like \input.

> Any comments welcome.

I agree with your suggestion. Considering that \include and \input have
similar functionality and similar syntax, it's natural to fontify them
in the same way.

I guess the reason why the warning face is assigned to \include is that
it affects the look much as \newpage, \clearpage and \pagebreak do.
However, that reason would also apply for \input, which has possibility
to have \newpage and alikes in the contents it reads in. So I don't see
strong reason to keep the warning face for \include.

Regards,
Ikumi Keita