Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: XLog - some impressions and feature requests (plus release goals)

[Joop Stakenborg]

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:07:24 +0100
Luc Langehegermann <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tuesday 03 December 2002 22:47, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> >
> > Instead of VFOA and VFOB, maybe RIG_VFO_TX and RIG_VFO_RX?
> > These new defines will appear in Hamlib 1.1.4. Actually, they are
> > already in (but not implemented everywhere), with a fodtrack backend...
> >
> > > Well no... an example:
> > >
> > > Mode: SSB
> > > Uplink: 2401322500
> > > Downlink: 435664500
> > > Satellite: AO-40
> >
> > I guess you're using a transverter for the Uplink (144MHz-2.4GHz).
> > And xlog may not be aware of it. So this information will have to be
> > present somewhere, either in Hamlib or xlog..
> >
> 
> Well... there seems to be some confusion. I don't want to directly use hamlib 
> with X-Log. I use the rig/hamlib with K-Track for automatic doppler 
> compensation and antenne turning. I 'only' want to transfer the 2 
> frequencies, the mode and the satellite from K-Track to X-Log.

That makes life a lot easier for me. I will explain you how to
do it when the next beta comes out.

> 
> Luc
> 
> 
> 

Joop