[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy software-patents.html
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
www/philosophy software-patents.html |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 06:24:17 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Ineiev <ineiev> 22/12/13 06:24:17
Modified files:
philosophy : software-patents.html
Log message:
Fix a typo.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/software-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
Patches:
Index: software-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/software-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- software-patents.html 12 Dec 2022 19:31:14 -0000 1.55
+++ software-patents.html 13 Dec 2022 11:24:16 -0000 1.56
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@
fields, why should software be exempt?” Note the bizarre
assumption in there that somehow we are all supposed to suffer through
the patent system. It is like saying “Some people get cancer.
-Why should you be exempt?” <i>Laughs]</i> As I see it, each person
+Why should you be exempt?” <i>[laughs]</i> As I see it, each person
who doesn't get cancer is good. But there is, behind that, a less biased
question, which is a good question, which is: Is software different
from other fields? Should patent policy be different in different
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/12/12 19:31:14 $
+$Date: 2022/12/13 11:24:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>