www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html ebooks...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html ebooks...
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:29:56 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/11/01 13:29:56

Modified files:
        philosophy     : drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html 
                         ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html 
                         ebooks.ar.html 
Added files:
        philosophy/po  : drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html 
                         ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html 
                         ebooks.ar-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ebooks.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ebooks.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html   27 Aug 2019 15:31:20 -0000      1.4
+++ drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.html   1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 -0000       1.5
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2021-09-02" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-tw.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-tw.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-tw.html" -->
 <h2>給 Dr. Dobb's 期刊編輯的公開信</h2>
 
 <p>
@@ -125,7 +131,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 更新時間︰
 
-$Date: 2019/08/27 15:31:20 $
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html     22 Apr 2021 12:29:53 -0000      
1.1
+++ ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.html     1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 -0000       
1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2021-09-02" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-tw.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.translist" 
-->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-tw.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-tw.html" -->
 <h2>電子書必須增強我們的自由,而非降低</h2>
 <p>作者為 <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard 
Stallman</strong></a></p>
 
@@ -137,7 +143,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 更新時間︰
 
-$Date: 2021/04/22 12:29:53 $
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: ebooks.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/ebooks.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- ebooks.ar.html      30 May 2021 17:01:44 -0000      1.22
+++ ebooks.ar.html      1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 -0000       1.23
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/ebooks.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/ebooks.ar.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/ebooks.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/ebooks.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/ebooks.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2021-09-02" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/ebooks.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ebooks.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
 <h2>الكتب الإلكترونية: الحرية أو حقوق 
النشر</h2>
 
 <p>بقلم <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>ريتشارد 
ستالمن</strong></a></p>
@@ -153,7 +159,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 حُدّثت:
 
-$Date: 2021/05/30 17:01:44 $
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html
diff -N po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/drdobbs-letter.zh-tw-diff.html   1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 -0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/drdobbs-letter.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.96 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays aboutfs free-open" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes"</em></ins></span> --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Letter to the Editor of Dr. Dobb's Journal
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/drdobbs-letter.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div class="article reduced-width"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;h2&gt;Letter to the Editor of Dr. Dobb's Journal&lt;/h2&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div 
class="thin"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Dear Editor,
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+I am sure you don't realize how ironic it is to associate me and Tim
+O'Reilly with &ldquo;open <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>source&rdquo;.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>source.&rdquo;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+If the House Un-American Activities Committee asked me, &ldquo;Are you
+now or have you ever been a supporter of the open source
+movement,&rdquo; I could proudly and cheerfully say no.  I've been
+campaigning since 1984 for &lt;em&gt;free software&lt;/em&gt;&mdash;free as in
+freedom.  (See the GNU Manifesto, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Sept. 1985.)
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Free software means, roughly, that you are free to study what it does,
+free to change it, free to redistribute it, and free to publish
+improved versions.
+(See &lt;a 
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"&gt;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html&lt;/a&gt;
+for more details.)  You deserve these freedoms; everyone deserves
+them.  I wrote the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL), the target
+of &lt;a href="/philosophy/gpl-american-way.html"&gt;Microsoft's greatest
+ire&lt;/a&gt;, to defend these freedoms for all users, in the spirit of the
+free software movement.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Years later, in 1998, another group began operating under the term
+&ldquo;open <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>source&rdquo;.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>source.&rdquo;</em></ins></span>  They have 
contributed to the free software
+community in practical ways, but they stand for very different views.
+They studiously avoid the issues of freedom and principle that we
+raise in the free software movement; they cite only short-term
+practical benefits as the reasons for what they do.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Their stated definition for the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; is
+somewhat broader than free software, and thus includes my work.  But
+describing the GNU GPL as an &ldquo;open source license,&rdquo; as
+Microsoft did, is more than half misleading.  The GNU GPL embodies the
+firm philosophy of the free software movement; it doesn't come from
+the open source movement.  I am not a supporter of the open source
+movement, and never have been.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Tim O'Reilly, by contrast, is a pillar of the open source movement, at
+least to hear him tell it.  However, if you look at actions rather
+than words, most of the manuals published by O'Reilly Associates do
+not qualify as open source, let alone as free.  The handful of free
+titles are exceptions.  He could easily excuse himself to
+&lt;abbr title="House Un-American Activities 
Committee"&gt;HUAC&lt;/abbr&gt;&mdash;&ldquo;Yes, 
+I talked about open source, but I didn't really do much of it.&rdquo;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+If O'Reilly moves to selling free-as-in-freedom books in the future, he
+could become a true supporter of the free software movement, or at least
+the open source movement.  [Later in 2001, O'Reilly Associates published a
+couple of additional free books.  We are grateful for this contribution to
+the free software community, and we look forward to more of the same.]
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+With the recent founding of FSF-Europe, and the coming inauguration of
+FSF-India, the free software movement is going stronger than ever.
+Please don't lump us in with the other movement in our community.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Sincerely,
+&lt;/p&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Richard Stallman
+President,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;address&gt;
+&mdash;&lt;br /&gt;
+Richard Stallman&lt;br /&gt;
+President,&lt;br /&gt;</em></ins></span>
+Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
+&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation&lt;/address&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>id="footer"&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="footer" role="contentinfo"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"&gt;
+        &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2000, <span class="removed"><del><strong>2007, 
2014</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2021</em></ins></span> Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;/div&gt;</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for class="inner", starts 
in the banner include --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html
diff -N po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw-diff.html     1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 
-0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.84</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.96 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural access" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes"</em></ins></span> --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;E-books must increase our freedom, not decrease it
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/philosophy/po/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div class="article reduced-width"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;h2&gt;E-books must increase our freedom, not decrease it&lt;/h2&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;by &lt;a 
href="http://www.stallman.org/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard
+Stallman&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This essay was originally published by &lt;cite&gt;The 
Guardian&lt;/cite&gt;, on 17 April 2012,
+as &ldquo;&lt;a
+href="//www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman"&gt;Technology
+Should Help Us Share, Not Constrain Us&lt;/a&gt;&rdquo;, with some surprise 
editing.  This
+version incorporates parts of that editing while restoring parts of the 
original
+text.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Also consider reading</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;address 
class="byline"&gt;by</em></ins></span> &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/ebooks.html"&gt;
+E-Books: Freedom Or Copyright&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;hr /&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://www.stallman.org/"&gt;Richard
+Stallman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/address&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;I love The Jehovah Contract, and I'd like everyone else to love it
+too. I have lent it out at least six times over the years. Printed
+books let us do that.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;I couldn't do that with most commercial e-books. It's &ldquo;not 
<span class="removed"><del><strong>allowed&rdquo;.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>allowed.&rdquo;</em></ins></span>
+And if I tried to disobey, the software in e-readers has malicious
+features called Digital Restrictions Management (DRM, for short) to restrict 
reading,
+so it simply won't work. The e-books are encrypted so that only
+proprietary software with malicious functionality can display them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Many other habits that we readers are accustomed to are &ldquo;not
+allowed&rdquo; for e-books. With the Amazon &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo; (for which 
&lt;a 
href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html"&gt;&ldquo;Swindle&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;
+is a more fitting name), to take one example,
+users can't buy a book anonymously with cash. &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo; books are
+typically available from Amazon only, and Amazon makes users identify
+themselves. Thus, Amazon knows exactly which books each user has
+read. In a country such as the UK, where you can be &lt;a
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-mar-jun.html#07_April_2012_%28Wrong_book%29"&gt;prosecuted</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-mar-jun.html#07_April_2012_%28Wrong_book%29"&gt;prosecuted</em></ins></span>
 for
+possessing a forbidden book&lt;/a&gt;, this is more than hypothetically
+Orwellian.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, you can't sell the e-book after you read it (if Amazon 
has its way,
+the used book stores where I have passed many an afternoon will be
+history). You can't give it to a friend either, because according to
+Amazon you never really owned it. Amazon requires users to sign an
+End-User License Agreement (&ldquo;EULA&rdquo;) which says so.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;You can't even be sure it will still be in your machine tomorrow.
+People reading 1984 in the &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo; had an Orwellian experience: 
their
+e-books vanished right before their eyes, as Amazon used a malicious
+software feature called a &ldquo;back door&rdquo; to remotely delete them
+(virtual book-burning; is that what &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo; means?). But don't 
worry;
+Amazon promised never to do this again, except by order of the state.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;With software, either the users control the program (making such 
software &lt;a
+href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"&gt;Libre or Free&lt;/a&gt;)
+or the program controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book
+policies imitate the distribution policies of non-Libre software, but
+that's not the only relationship between the two. The
+&lt;a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html"&gt;malicious
+software features&lt;/a&gt; described above are imposed on users via software
+that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features like
+those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then
+provide the corrected version to all the other users. Users can't
+change non-Libre software, which makes it &lt;a
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer"&gt;</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer"&gt;</em></ins></span>
 an ideal
+instrument for exercising power over the public&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Any one of these encroachments on our freedom is reason aplenty to say
+no. If these policies were limited to Amazon, we'd bypass them, but
+the other e-book dealers' policies are roughly similar.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div class="announcement comment" 
role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html"&gt;Join 
our mailing list
+about the dangers of eBooks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;What worries me most is the prospect of losing the option of printed
+books. The Guardian has announced &ldquo;digital-only reads&rdquo;: in other
+words, books available only at the price of freedom. I will not read
+any book at that price. Five years from now, will unauthorized copies
+be the only ethically acceptable copies for most books?&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;It doesn't have to be that way. With anonymous payment on the
+Internet, paying for downloads of non-DRM non-EULA e-books would
+respect our freedom. Physical stores could sell such e-books for
+cash, like digital music on CDs&mdash;still available even though the
+music industry is aggressively pushing DRM-restrictive services such
+as Spotify. Physical CD stores face the burden of an expensive
+inventory, but physical e-book stores could write copies onto your USB
+memory stick, the only inventory being memory sticks to sell if you
+need.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The reason publishers give for their restrictive e-books practices is 
to stop
+people from sharing copies. They say this is for the sake of the
+authors; but even if it did serve the authors' interests (which for
+quite famous authors it may), it could not justify DRM, EULAs or the Digital
+Economy Act which persecutes readers for sharing.
+In practice, the copyright system does a bad job of supporting authors
+aside from the most popular ones. Other authors' principal interest is to be 
better
+known, so sharing their work benefits them as well as readers. Why not switch 
to a
+system that does the job better and is compatible with sharing?&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A tax on memories and Internet connectivity, along the general lines
+of what most EU countries do, could do the job well if three points
+are got right. The money should be collected by the state and
+distributed according to law, not given to a private collecting
+society; it should be divided among all authors, and we mustn’t let
+companies take any of it from them; and the distribution of money
+should be based on a sliding scale, not in linear proportion to
+popularity. I suggest using the cube root of each author's
+popularity: if A is eight times as popular as B, A gets twice B's
+amount (not eight times B's amount). This would support many fairly
+popular writers adequately instead of making a few stars richer.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Another system is to give each e-reader a button to send some small
+sum (perhaps 25 pence in the UK) to the author.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Sharing is good, and with digital technology, sharing is easy. (I
+mean non-commercial redistribution of exact copies.) So sharing ought
+to be legal, and preventing sharing is no excuse to make e-books into
+handcuffs for readers. If e-books mean that readers' freedom must
+either increase or decrease, we must demand the increase.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;blockquote 
class="announcement"&gt;&lt;p&gt;</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div class="announcement comment" 
role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Also consider reading</em></ins></span> &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html"&gt;Join
 our mailing list
+about the dangers</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/ebooks.html"&gt;
+E-Books: Freedom Or Copyright&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="infobox extra" role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;This essay was originally published by &lt;cite&gt;The 
Guardian&lt;/cite&gt;, on 17 April 2012,
+as &ldquo;&lt;a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman"&gt;Technology
+Should Help Us Share, Not Constrain Us&lt;/a&gt;,&rdquo; with some surprise 
editing.  This
+version incorporates parts</em></ins></span> of <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>eBooks&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>that editing while restoring parts of the original
+text.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>id="footer"&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="footer" role="contentinfo"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"&gt;
+        &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2012, <span class="removed"><del><strong>2015, 2016, 
2017</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2021</em></ins></span> Richard Stallman&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;/div&gt;</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for class="inner", starts 
in the banner include --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/ebooks.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/ebooks.ar-diff.html
diff -N po/ebooks.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/ebooks.ar-diff.html      1 Nov 2021 17:29:56 -0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/ebooks.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>1.79</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.96 --&gt;
+&lt;!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural access" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes"</em></ins></span> --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;E-Books: Freedom Or Copyright
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ebooks.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div class="article reduced-width"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;h2&gt;E-Books: Freedom Or Copyright&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;by &lt;a 
href="http://www.stallman.org/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard
+Stallman&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a slightly modified version of an article published
+in &lt;cite&gt;Technology Review&lt;/cite&gt; in 2000.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Also consider reading</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;address 
class="byline"&gt;by</em></ins></span> &lt;a
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html"&gt;E-books
 must
+increase our freedom, not decrease it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;hr /&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="https://www.stallman.org/"&gt;Richard
+Stallman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/address&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time, in the age of the printing press, an industrial
+regulation was established to cover the business of writing and
+publishing. It was called copyright. Copyright's purpose, stated in
+the US Constitution, was to &ldquo;promote progress&rdquo;&mdash;that
+is, to encourage publication. The method used was to make publishers
+get permission from authors for using recent works.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Ordinary readers had little reason to disapprove, since copyright
+restricted only publication, not the things a reader could do. If it
+raised the price of a book a small amount, that was only money; it did
+not contort readers' way of life. Copyright provided a public benefit,
+as intended, with little burden on the public. It did its job
+well&mdash;back then.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Then a new way of distributing information came about: computers
+and networks. The advantage of digital information technology is
+that it facilitates copying and manipulating information, including
+software, musical recordings and books. Networks offered the
+possibility of unlimited access to all sorts of data, an
+information utopia.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But one obstacle stood in the way: copyright. Readers who
+made use of their computers to share published information were
+technically copyright infringers. The world had changed around this
+law, so that what was once an industrial regulation on publishers
+had become a restriction on the public it was meant to serve.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In a system of real democracy, a law that prohibits a popular,
+natural, and useful activity is usually soon relaxed. But the
+powerful publishers' lobby was determined to prevent the public
+from taking advantage of the power of their computers, and found
+copyright a suitable weapon. Under their influence, rather than
+relaxing copyright to suit the new circumstances, governments made
+it stricter than ever, imposing harsh penalties on readers caught
+sharing.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But that wasn't the last of it. Computers can be powerful tools
+of domination, when a few people control what other people's
+computers do. The publishers realized that by forcing people to use
+specially designated software to read e-books, they could gain
+unprecedented power: they could compel readers to pay, and identify
+themselves, every time they read a book! That is the publishers'
+dream.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;So they prevailed upon the US government to give them the
+Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, a law giving them total
+legal power over almost anything a reader might do with an e-book.
+Even reading it without authorization is a crime.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div class="announcement comment" 
role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html"&gt;Join 
our mailing list
+about the dangers of eBooks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;We still have the same old freedoms in using paper books. But if
+e-books replace printed books, that exception will do little good.
+With &ldquo;electronic <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>ink&rdquo;,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>ink,&rdquo;</em></ins></span> which makes it possible 
to download
+new text onto an apparently printed piece of paper, even newspapers
+could become ephemeral. Imagine: no more used book stores; no more
+lending a book to your friend; no more borrowing one from the public
+library&mdash;no more &ldquo;leaks&rdquo; that might give someone a
+chance to read without paying. And judging from the ads for Microsoft
+Reader, no more anonymous purchasing of books. This is the world
+publishers have in mind for us.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Why is there so little public debate about these momentous changes?
+Most citizens have not yet had occasion to come to grips with the
+political issues raised by this futuristic technology.  Besides, the
+public has been taught that copyright exists to &ldquo;protect&rdquo;
+the copyright holders, with the implication that the public's
+interests do not count.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But when the public at large begins to use e-books, and
+discovers the regime that the publishers have prepared for them,
+they will begin to resist. Humanity will not accept this yoke
+forever.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The publishers would have us believe that suppressive copyright
+is the only way to keep art alive, but we do not need a War on
+Copying to encourage a diversity of published works; as the
+Grateful Dead showed, copying among fans is not a problem for the
+artists. By legalizing the noncommercial copying of e-books, we can
+turn copyright back into the industrial regulation it once was.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For some kinds of writing, we should go even further. For
+scholarly papers and monographs, everyone should be encouraged to
+republish them verbatim online; this helps protect the scholarly
+record while making it more accessible. For textbooks and most
+reference works, publication of modified versions should be allowed
+as well, since that encourages society to improve them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Eventually, when computer networks provide an easy way to send
+someone a small amount of money, the whole rationale for restricting
+verbatim copying will go away. If you like a book, and it pops up a
+box saying, &ldquo;Click here to give the author one <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>dollar&rdquo;,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>dollar,&rdquo;</em></ins></span>
+wouldn't you click? Copyright for books and music, as it applies to
+distributing verbatim unmodified copies, will be entirely obsolete.
+And not a moment too soon!&lt;/p&gt;
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;blockquote class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;a 
href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html"&gt;Join</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;div class="announcement comment" 
role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr class="no-display" /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Also consider reading &lt;a
+href="/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html"&gt;E-books must
+increase</em></ins></span> our <span class="removed"><del><strong>mailing
+list about the dangers</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>freedom, not decrease it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="infobox extra" role="complementary"&gt;
+&lt;hr /&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;This is a slightly modified version</em></ins></span> of <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>eBooks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>an 
article published in
+&lt;cite&gt;Technology Review&lt;/cite&gt; in 2000.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>id="footer"&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="footer" role="contentinfo"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are also 
&lt;a
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"&gt;&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"&gt;
+        &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
+information on coordinating and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>submitting</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>contributing</em></ins></span> translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, 
standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2000, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2016</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2021</em></ins></span> Richard Stallman&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2021/11/01 17:29:56 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;/div&gt;</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for class="inner", starts 
in the banner include --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]