[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po rms-hack.fr-en.html
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po rms-hack.fr-en.html |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:03:48 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/09/22 08:03:48
Modified files:
philosophy/po : rms-hack.fr-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/rms-hack.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
Patches:
Index: rms-hack.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/rms-hack.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- rms-hack.fr-en.html 10 Sep 2021 09:02:16 -0000 1.36
+++ rms-hack.fr-en.html 22 Sep 2021 12:03:47 -0000 1.37
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
share and change software; that was the basis for our free-wheeling
community.</p>
<p>
-<b>TV:</b> What does the word ‘hacker’ mean to you,
+<b>TV:</b> What does the word “hacker” mean to you,
personally?</p>
<p>
<b>RMS:</b> It means someone who enjoys playful cleverness, especially
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
<p><b>RMS:</b> More or less. I would say that freedom has value in
itself, just as powerful reliable software does.</p>
-<p><b>TV:</b> But isn't there a problem here; one of the utilitarian
+<p><b>TV:</b> But isn't there a problem here? one of the utilitarian
calculations of “open source” is that it is more
profitable—in the sense of making more money or making better
software—to use an open source license than a copyleft
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
<p><b>TV:</b> The question about hacker aesthetics—as you
explained, there is no special hacker ethics, because a hacker can act
ethically or unethically and nothing in hackerism itself necessitates
-ethical behaviour.</p>
+ethical behavior.</p>
<p><b>RMS:</b> Hacking is not primarily about an ethical issue. It is an idea
of
what makes life meaningful. But he may be right that hacking tends to
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
<h3>Community</h3>
<p><b>TV:</b> Now that brings to mind several questions. For the
-first, one could maybe inquire after an ideal society or do forth, but
+first, one could maybe inquire after an ideal society or go forth, but
let's leave that for the moment.</p>
<p><b>RMS:</b> I approach these issues incrementally. I don't think I
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
<p><b>TV:</b> Is there something that digitalization offers for
community-building, something that other media (like printed books)
-could not offer, or does digitalization mean ‘just’ and
+could not offer, or does digitalization mean “just” an
effectivization of existing means?</p>
<p><b>RMS:</b> Computers and the web make it much easier to work
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@
<p><b>TV:</b> You have touched on some issues of globalization is some
recent interviews. One of the problems is that copyright laws put many
-third world countries in an unfavourable position. Do you think that
+third world countries in an unfavorable position. Do you think that
those countries should not follow the copyright laws?</p>
<p><b>RMS:</b> The US when it was a developing country did not
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
<p><b>TV:</b> I think this is even quite common in fields like
computer science, physics, mathematics, philosophy, where the
austerity and purity of the formalism give an intense pleasure of a
-‘non-earthly’ kind. Is there a link? Should there be? And
+“non-earthly” kind. Is there a link? Should there be? And
how do you bridge the two?</p>
<p><b>RMS:</b> Is there a link between the pleasure of pure math and
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/10 09:02:16 $
+$Date: 2021/09/22 12:03:47 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/po rms-hack.fr-en.html,
GNUN <=