[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www philosophy/motif.es.html philosophy/my_doom...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www philosophy/motif.es.html philosophy/my_doom... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:04:37 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/09/13 07:04:37
Modified files:
philosophy : motif.es.html my_doom.es.html plan-nine.es.html
shouldbefree.es.html use-free-software.es.html
using-gfdl.es.html why-copyleft.es.html
philosophy/po : misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html
misinterpreting-copyright.es.po
motif.es-en.html motif.es.po my_doom.es-en.html
my_doom.es.po plan-nine.es-en.html
plan-nine.es.po shouldbefree.es-en.html
shouldbefree.es.po use-free-software.es-en.html
use-free-software.es.po using-gfdl.es-en.html
using-gfdl.es.po why-copyleft.es.po
words-to-avoid.es-en.html words-to-avoid.es.po
server/po : sitemap.es-en.html sitemap.es.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/motif.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/my_doom.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/plan-nine.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/shouldbefree.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/use-free-software.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/using-gfdl.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/motif.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/motif.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/my_doom.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/my_doom.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/plan-nine.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/plan-nine.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/use-free-software.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/use-free-software.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.106&r2=1.107
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.284&r2=1.285
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/server/po/sitemap.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.187&r2=1.188
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/server/po/sitemap.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.448&r2=1.449
Patches:
Index: philosophy/motif.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/motif.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- philosophy/motif.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000 1.28
+++ philosophy/motif.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.29
@@ -14,20 +14,19 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>La Licencia de Motif</h2>
<address class="byline">por <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Hace un par de semanas, el <cite>Open Group</cite> cambió la licencia de
Motif e invitó a los desarrolladores de software libre a usarla. Sin
embargo, la nueva licencia de Motif no cumple con la definición de software
libre, ni con la más flexible definición de software de código abierto.</p>
<p>
-En el anuncio declaran que han publicado Motif para «la comunidad del
-código abierto», pero esto sólo es cierto si se hace una interpretación
poco
+En el anuncio declaran que han publicado Motif para «la comunidad del código
+abierto», pero esto solo es cierto si se hace una interpretación poco
natural de las palabras. No pusieron Motif a disposición de la comunidad del
software libre; lo que hicieron fue invitar a la gente de la comunidad del
software libre a abandonar la comunidad mediante el uso de Motif.</p>
@@ -79,9 +78,8 @@
<h3 id="LaterNote" class="footnote">Nota posterior</h3>
<p>
-<em>En 2012 <a href="http://motif.sourceforge.net/";> Motif</a> se publicó
-bajo la Licencia Pública General Reducida de GNU, versión 2.1.</em></p>
-</div>
+<em>En 2012 <a href="https://motif.ics.com/";> Motif</a> se publicó bajo la
+Licencia Pública General Reducida de GNU, versión 2.1.</em></p>
</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -146,7 +144,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/my_doom.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/my_doom.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- philosophy/my_doom.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000 1.44
+++ philosophy/my_doom.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.45
@@ -14,12 +14,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>MyDoom y usted</h2>
<address class="byline">por <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Crecà en una comunidad cuyos miembros cometÃan crÃmenes tan graves como
homicidios. La ciudad de Nueva York, con sus 8 millones de habitantes, tenÃa
@@ -93,7 +92,6 @@
excusas para la culpabilidad por asociación. No en Nueva York, no en
Cambridge, y no en el Mundo Libre.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -138,6 +136,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2004, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -154,7 +168,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/plan-nine.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/plan-nine.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- philosophy/plan-nine.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:21 -0000 1.42
+++ philosophy/plan-nine.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.43
@@ -7,25 +7,26 @@
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
-<title>Los problemas de la licencia de Plan 9 - Proyecto GNU - Free Software
-Foundation</title>
+<title>Los problemas de la (antigua) licencia de Plan 9 - Proyecto GNU - Free
+Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/plan-nine.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.es.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Los problemas de la (anterior) licencia de Plan 9.</h2>
<address class="byline">por <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
+<div class="infobox">
<p><em>Nota:</em> Este texto se refiere a la anterior licencia usada por Plan
9. La licencia actual de Plan 9 se considera de software libre (y también de
código abierto). Por esto, el ejemplo especÃfico de este artÃculo sólo
tiene
relevancia histórica. Sin embargo, el punto principal sigue siendo
válido.</p>
-
-<hr />
+</div>
+<hr class="thin" />
<p>
Cuando vi el anuncio de que el software de Plan 9 se habÃa liberado como
@@ -40,8 +41,9 @@
cuando uno de sus lÃderes me dijo que ellos tampoco consideraban la licencia
aceptable. Cuando los desarrolladores de Plan 9 la describen como «código
abierto», están alterando el significado de ese término y aumentando la
-confusión. (El término «código abierto» es ampliamente malentendido; vea
<a
-href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html</a>.)</p>
+confusión. (El término «código abierto» es ampliamente malinterpretado;
vea
+<a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html">gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html</a>.)</p>
<p>
Esta es una lista de los problemas que he encontrado en la licencia de Plan
@@ -215,7 +217,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:21 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/shouldbefree.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/shouldbefree.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- philosophy/shouldbefree.es.html 29 Aug 2021 10:32:32 -0000 1.45
+++ philosophy/shouldbefree.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.46
@@ -930,6 +930,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 1991, 1992, 1998, 2006, 2010, 2021 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
@@ -948,7 +964,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/29 10:32:32 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/use-free-software.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/use-free-software.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- philosophy/use-free-software.es.html 21 Aug 2021 12:33:04 -0000
1.52
+++ philosophy/use-free-software.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000
1.53
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: .2em">
La comunidad del software libre 20 años después: </h2>
<h3 style="margin: 0 0 1.2em">
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
<address class="byline">por <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Hace veinte años, el 5 de enero de 1984, abandoné mi empleo en el <abbr
title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</abbr> para empezar a
@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@
<p>
Pero si nuestro objetivo es la libertad, todo cambia. Los usuarios no pueden
-ser libres mientras usen un programa que no lo es. Para liberar a los
+ser libres mientras utilicen un programa que no lo es. Para liberar a los
ciudadanos del ciberespacio, tenemos que reemplazar esos programas que no
son libres, no aceptarlos. No son contribuciones a nuestra comunidad, son
tentaciones para aceptar la falta de libertad.</p>
@@ -124,9 +123,8 @@
reconocer que el software que no es libre es moralmente inaceptable. La
gente que valora la libertad es, a largo plazo, su mejor y más esencial
defensa. </p>
-</div>
-<div class="infobox">
+<div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
<hr />
<p>Publicado originalmente en <cite>NewsForge</cite>.</p>
</div>
@@ -209,7 +207,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/21 12:33:04 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/using-gfdl.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/using-gfdl.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- philosophy/using-gfdl.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:22 -0000 1.47
+++ philosophy/using-gfdl.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.48
@@ -14,12 +14,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Usando la FDL de GNU</h2>
<address class="byline">por <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>Si conoce a alguien que esté escribiendo un manual sobre software libre, y
se proponga publicarlo comercialmente, tienes la oportunidad de prestar una
gran ayuda al movimiento del Software Libre con poco esfuerzo: sugiérale la
@@ -41,7 +40,7 @@
manera que es imprescindible que los autores tomen la iniciativa: que digan
«Queremos utilizar la FDL de GNU para este libro». Asà que cuando su amigo
mencione que está escribiendo un manual, puede influir en el rumbo de los
-acontecimientos simplemente mostrándole esta posibilidad. </p>
+acontecimientos simplemente mostrándole esta posibilidad.</p>
<p>Si una editorial rechaza la petición en primera instancia, el Proyecto GNU
podrÃa ayudar a que los autores prevalezcan. Pueden ponerse en contacto con
@@ -53,10 +52,10 @@
opcionales; la licencia es libre si no se utiliza ninguna de las dos
cláusulas, pero disponer de alguna de ellas hace que el libro deje de ser
libre. (Véase <a
-href="/licenses/license-list.es.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html.</a>).
+href="/licenses/license-list.es.html">gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html.</a>).
Los autores que quieran publicar documentación libre, pero usando una
licencia distinta de la FDL de GNU, pueden ponerse en contacto con nosotros,
-para que verifiquemos si la licencia realmente es para documentación libre.
</p>
+para que verifiquemos si la licencia realmente es para documentación
libre.</p>
<p>Cuando un manual comercial es libre y se refiere al sistema GNU, el Proyecto
GNU puede recomendarlo al público. De manera que si los autores o la
@@ -69,7 +68,6 @@
tratando de persuadir al público para que compre). Por favor avise a <a
href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org";><webmasters@gnu.org></a> sobre tales
páginas.</p>
-</div>
<hr class="column-limit" />
<p>Ver también <a href="/philosophy/free-doc.es.html">software libre y
manuales
@@ -150,7 +148,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:22 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/why-copyleft.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- philosophy/why-copyleft.es.html 2 Sep 2021 17:36:33 -0000 1.34
+++ philosophy/why-copyleft.es.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.35
@@ -18,43 +18,42 @@
<h2>¿Por qué Copyleft?</h2>
<div class="important">
-<p><em>«Cuando llega el momento de defender la libertad de todos, tumbarse y
no
-hacer nada es un acto de debilidad, no de humildad.»</em></p>
+<p><em>«Cuando se trata de defender la libertad de todos, tumbarse y no hacer
+nada es un acto de debilidad, no de humildad.»</em></p>
</div>
<p>
-En el Proyecto GNU normalmente recomendamos usar licencias con <a
-href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> como la GPL de GNU en lugar de
-licencias de software libre permisivas que no tienen copyleft. No
-pronunciamos duras crÃticas en contra de estas últimas —de hecho, las
-recomendamos en circunstancias especiales— pero los defensores de
-tales licencias adoptan una actitud crÃtica muy dura contra la <abbr
-title="General Public License">GPL</abbr>.
+En el Proyecto GNU normalmente recomendamos utilizar licencias con <a
+href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>, como la GPL de GNU, en lugar de
+licencias de software libre permisivas sin copyleft. Nosotros no criticamos
+duramente estas licencias (de hecho, las recomendamos en determinadas
+circunstancias), pero sus defensores adoptan una actitud crÃtica muy dura
+contra la <abbr title="General Public License">GPL</abbr>.
</p>
<p>
-Durante una discusión sobre este tema, una persona afirmó que el uso de una
-de las licencias BSD era un «acto de humildad»: «No pido nada a quienes usan
-mi código, salvo el reconocimiento de mi trabajo». Resulta más bien
-exagerado llamar «humildad» una acción legal para obtener el reconocimiento,
-pero hay un punto más importante que es necesario analizar.
+En una discusión sobre este tema, una persona afirmó que la utilización de
+una de las licencias BSD es un «acto de humildad»: «No pido nada a quienes
+utilizan mi código, salvo el reconocimiento por mi trabajo». Es un poco
+forzado llamar «humildad» a una exigencia legal de obtener reconocimiento,
+pero hay una cuestión más importante a considerar aquÃ.
</p>
<p>
-Ser humilde significa dejar a un lado sus propios intereses, pero los
-intereses que usted abandona cuando deja de utilizar el copyleft para su
-código son mucho más amplios que los suyos propios. Alguien que se sirve de
-su código para desarrollar un programa que no es libre, está privando de
-libertad a otras personas; de modo que si permite esto, está dejando de
-defender la libertad de esas personas. Cuando se trata de defender la
-libertad de los demás, tumbarse y no hacer nada es un acto de debilidad, no
-de humildad.
+Ser humilde significa dejar a un lado los propios intereses, pero los
+intereses que se abandonan cuando se deja de utilizar el copyleft para el
+código que se ha escrito son mucho más amplios que los de uno mismo. Alguien
+que se sirve del código de los demás para desarrollar un programa que no es
+libre está privando de libertad a otras personas. De modo que si se permite
+esto, se está dejando de defender la libertad de esas personas. Cuando se
+trata de defender la libertad de los demás, tumbarse y no hacer nada es un
+acto de debilidad, no de humildad.
</p>
<p>
-No está mal que usted publique su código bajo <a
+No se está haciendo nada malo cuando se publica código bajo <a
href="/licenses/bsd.html">una de las licencias BSD</a> o alguna otra
-licencia permisiva, laxa; el programa sigue siendo software libre y es una
+licencia laxa y permisiva; el programa sigue siendo software libre y es una
contribución a la comunidad. Pero la protección es débil, y en la mayorÃa
de
los casos no es el mejor modo de promover la libertad de los usuarios de
compartir y modificar el software.
@@ -67,15 +66,15 @@
<ul>
<li>Quienes publicaron LLVM bajo una licencia sin copyleft, <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of";>permitieron
-a nVidia publicar un compilador de alta calidad que no era libre</a> para
-sus GPU, a la vez que mantenÃan sus instrucciones en secreto. Esta es la
+que nVidia publicara para sus GPU un compilador de alta calidad que no era
+libre</a>, a la vez que mantenÃan sus instrucciones en secreto. Esta es la
razón de que no podamos escribir un compilador libre para esa plataforma. La
adaptación privativa de LLVM es todo lo que existe para esas máquinas y (a
menos que se lleve a cabo un enorme trabajo de ingenierÃa inversa) es todo
lo que existirá en el futuro.</li>
-<li>En la puerta trasera del motor de administración de sus procesadores
-modernos, Intel utiliza <a
+<li>En la puerta trasera del motor de administración de sus actuales
+procesadores, Intel utiliza <a
href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html";>una
versión privativa del sistema MINIX</a>, que es libre pero sin copyleft.</li>
</ul>
@@ -150,13 +149,13 @@
<div class="translators-credits">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-<strong>Traducción: Fernando A. Naranjo Molina, 2003.</strong> Revisión:
-Miguel Abad, Leonardo Paredes.</div>
+<strong>Traducción: Fernando A. Naranjo Molina, 2003.</strong> Revisiones:
+Equipo de traductores al español de GNU.</div>
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/09/02 17:36:33 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html 5 Sep 2021 10:06:11
-0000 1.35
+++ philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35
-0000 1.36
@@ -353,9 +353,9 @@
<p>
An even worse law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), was
designed to bring back what was then called “copy
-protection” — now known
+protection”—now known
as <a href="/proprietary/proprietary-drm.html">DRM</a> (Digital
-Restrictions Management) — which users already detested,
+Restrictions Management)—which users already detested,
by making it a crime to defeat the restrictions, or even publish
information about how to defeat them. This law ought to be called the
“Domination by Media Corporations Act” because it
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:06:11 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.71
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -b -r1.71 -r1.72
--- philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:26
-0000 1.71
+++ philosophy/po/misinterpreting-copyright.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35
-0000 1.72
@@ -835,18 +835,6 @@
"no constituÃa delito en los Estados Unidos, bajo ningún concepto."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | An even worse law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), was
-# | designed to bring back what was then called “copy
-# | [-protection” — now-] {+protection”—now+} known as
-# | <a href=\"/proprietary/proprietary-drm.html\">DRM</a> (Digital
-# | Restrictions [-Management) — which-] {+Management)—which+}
-# | users already detested, by making it a crime to defeat the restrictions,
-# | or even publish information about how to defeat them. This law ought to
-# | be called the “Domination by Media Corporations Act” because
-# | it effectively offers publishers the chance to write their own copyright
-# | law. It says they can impose any restrictions whatsoever on the use of a
-# | work, and these restrictions take the force of law provided the work
-# | contains some sort of encryption or license manager to enforce them.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"An even worse law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), was designed "
Index: philosophy/po/motif.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/motif.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- philosophy/po/motif.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:27 -0000 1.13
+++ philosophy/po/motif.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.14
@@ -9,13 +9,12 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The Motif License</h2>
<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
A couple of weeks ago, the Open Group changed the license of Motif,
inviting free software developers to use it. However, the new Motif
@@ -23,7 +22,7 @@
looser definition of open source software.</p>
<p>
Their announcement says they have released Motif to “the open
-source community”, but this is true only in an unnatural
+source community,” but this is true only in an unnatural
interpretation of the words. They have not made Motif available
within the free software community; instead, they have invited the
people in the free software community to leave the community by using
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@
</li>
<li>The license is restricted to use on certain operating systems,
- those which fit a category they call “open source”.
+ those which fit a category they call “open source.”
Both the free software movement and the open source camp
consider use restrictions unacceptable.
</li>
@@ -75,11 +74,10 @@
<h3 id="LaterNote" class="footnote">Later Note</h3>
<p>
-<em>In 2012, <a href="http://motif.sourceforge.net/";>
+<em>In 2012, <a href="https://motif.ics.com/";>
Motif</a> was released under the GNU Lesser General Public
License, version 2.1.</em></p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -120,7 +118,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:27 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/motif.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/motif.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- philosophy/po/motif.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.18
+++ philosophy/po/motif.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.19
@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@
"embargo, la nueva licencia de Motif no cumple con la definición de software "
"libre, ni con la más flexible definición de software de código abierto."
-# | Their announcement says they have released Motif to “the open source
-# | [-community”,-] {+community,”+} but this is true only in an
-# | unnatural interpretation of the words. They have not made Motif available
-# | within the free software community; instead, they have invited the people
-# | in the free software community to leave the community by using Motif.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Their announcement says they have released Motif to “the open source "
@@ -109,14 +104,9 @@
msgstr ""
"Afirma que usted acepta la licencia por el simple hecho de «usar» Motif. "
"Eso se logra únicamente mediante la aplicación de una licencia de tipo "
-"«licencia de envoltura» <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev"
-"\"><sup>[1]</sup></a> o similar. Las licencias «de envoltura» son algo muy
"
-"malo."
-
-# | The license is restricted to use on certain operating systems, those which
-# | fit a category they call “open [-source”.-] {+source.”+}
-# | Both the free software movement and the open source camp consider use
-# | restrictions unacceptable.
+"«licencia de envoltura» <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev\"><sup>"
+"[1]</sup></a> o similar. Las licencias «de envoltura» son algo muy malo."
+
#. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
msgid ""
"The license is restricted to use on certain operating systems, those which "
@@ -157,9 +147,6 @@
msgid "Later Note"
msgstr "Nota posterior"
-# | <em>In 2012, <a [-href=\"http://motif.sourceforge.net/\";>-]
-# | {+href=\"https://motif.ics.com/\";>+} Motif</a> was released under the GNU
-# | Lesser General Public License, version 2.1.</em>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"<em>In 2012, <a href=\"https://motif.ics.com/\";> Motif</a> was released "
Index: philosophy/po/my_doom.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/my_doom.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- philosophy/po/my_doom.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:27 -0000 1.24
+++ philosophy/po/my_doom.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.25
@@ -10,13 +10,12 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>MyDoom and You</h2>
<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
I grew up in a community whose other members sometimes committed crimes as
serious as murder. The city of New York, with its 8 million
@@ -27,8 +26,8 @@
Other evils involving information rather than physical violence were
common also. For instance, some New York police regularly lied on the
witness stand, and even made up a word for it: instead of
-“testifying”, they described court appearances as
-“testilying”. Some New York programmers fell into the
+“testifying,” they described court appearances as
+“testilying.” Some New York programmers fell into the
lawful but socially destructive practice of proprietary software: they
offered other people attractive software packages without source code,
and exacted a promise not to share them with anyone else.</p>
@@ -92,7 +91,6 @@
without proof, and there is no excuse for guilt by association.
Not in New York, not in Cambridge, and not in the Free World.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -123,6 +121,23 @@
information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2004, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -133,7 +148,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:27 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/my_doom.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/my_doom.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- philosophy/po/my_doom.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.31
+++ philosophy/po/my_doom.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.32
@@ -50,15 +50,6 @@
"la ciudad. Robos y asaltos violentos eran aún más comunes."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Other evils involving information rather than physical violence were
-# | common also. For instance, some New York police regularly lied on the
-# | witness stand, and even made up a word for it: instead of
-# | [-“testifying”,-] {+“testifying,”+} they described
-# | court appearances as [-“testilying”.-]
-# | {+“testilying.”+} Some New York programmers fell into the
-# | lawful but socially destructive practice of proprietary software: they
-# | offered other people attractive software packages without source code, and
-# | exacted a promise not to share them with anyone else.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Other evils involving information rather than physical violence were common "
Index: philosophy/po/plan-nine.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/plan-nine.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- philosophy/po/plan-nine.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:27 -0000 1.24
+++ philosophy/po/plan-nine.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.25
@@ -3,42 +3,43 @@
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays licensing non-cpleft" -->
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
-<title>The Problems of the Plan 9 License
+<title>The Problems of the (Earlier) Plan 9 License
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/plan-nine.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The Problems of the (Earlier) Plan 9 License</h2>
<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
+<div class="infobox">
<p><em>Note:</em> This applies to the earlier license used for Plan 9.
The current license of Plan 9 does qualify as free software (and also
as open source). So this article's specific example is of historical
relevance only. Nonetheless, the general point remains valid.</p>
-
-<hr />
+</div>
+<hr class="thin" />
<p>
When I saw the announcement that the Plan 9 software had been released
-as “open source”, I wondered whether it might be free
+as “open source,” I wondered whether it might be free
software as well. After studying the license, my conclusion was that
it is not free; the license contains several restrictions that are
totally unacceptable for the Free Software Movement. (See
-<a
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>.)</p>
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>.)</p>
<p>
I am not a supporter of the Open Source Movement, but I was glad when
one of their leaders told me they don't consider the license
acceptable either. When the developers of Plan 9 describe it as
-“open source”, they are altering the meaning of that term
+“open source,” they are altering the meaning of that term
and thus spreading confusion. (The term “open source” is
widely misunderstood;
-see <a
href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html</a>.)</p>
+see <a
href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html</a>.)</p>
<p>
Here is a list of the problems that I found in the Plan 9 license.
@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:27 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/plan-nine.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/plan-nine.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- philosophy/po/plan-nine.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.26
+++ philosophy/po/plan-nine.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.27
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
-# | The Problems of the {+(Earlier)+} Plan 9 License - GNU Project - Free
-# | Software Foundation
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
"The Problems of the (Earlier) Plan 9 License - GNU Project - Free Software "
@@ -56,13 +54,6 @@
"relevancia histórica. Sin embargo, el punto principal sigue siendo válido."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | When I saw the announcement that the Plan 9 software had been released as
-# | “open [-source”,-] {+source,”+} I wondered whether it
-# | might be free software as well. After studying the license, my conclusion
-# | was that it is not free; the license contains several restrictions that
-# | are totally unacceptable for the Free Software Movement. (See <a
-# |
[-href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>.)-]
-# | {+href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>.)+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"When I saw the announcement that the Plan 9 software had been released as "
@@ -80,15 +71,6 @@
"html\">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.es.html</a>)."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | I am not a supporter of the Open Source Movement, but I was glad when one
-# | of their leaders told me they don't consider the license acceptable
-# | either. When the developers of Plan 9 describe it as “open
-# | [-source”,-] {+source,”+} they are altering the meaning of
-# | that term and thus spreading confusion. (The term “open
-# | source” is widely misunderstood; see <a
-# |
[-href=\"/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html\">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html</a>.)-]
-# | {+href=\"/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html\">gnu.org/philosophy
-# | /open-source-misses-the-point.html</a>.)+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"I am not a supporter of the Open Source Movement, but I was glad when one of "
Index: philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es-en.html 29 Aug 2021 10:32:33 -0000
1.29
+++ philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000
1.30
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
will not be allowed to use their work. This leads to an attitude of
cynicism or denial. A programmer may describe enthusiastically the
work that he finds technically exciting; then when asked, “Will I be
-permitted to use it?”, his face falls, and he admits the answer is no.
+permitted to use it?” his face falls, and he admits the answer is no.
To avoid feeling discouraged, he either ignores this fact most of the
time or adopts a cynical stance designed to minimize the importance of
it.</p>
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@
<p>
It is common today for university researchers to get grants to
develop a system, develop it nearly to the point of completion and
-call that “finished”, and then start companies where they
+call that “finished,” and then start companies where they
really finish the project and make it usable. Sometimes they declare
the unfinished version “free”; if they are thoroughly
corrupt, they instead get an exclusive license from the university.
@@ -878,6 +878,23 @@
information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 1991, 1992, 1998, 2006, 2010, 2021 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
@@ -889,7 +906,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/29 10:32:33 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.35
+++ philosophy/po/shouldbefree.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.36
@@ -645,13 +645,6 @@
"trata también de un tipo de daño psicosocial, pero se puede escapar de ello
"
"concluyendo que estas licencias y estas leyes no tienen fuerza moral alguna."
-# | Programmers also suffer psychosocial harm knowing that many users will not
-# | be allowed to use their work. This leads to an attitude of cynicism or
-# | denial. A programmer may describe enthusiastically the work that he finds
-# | technically exciting; then when asked, “Will I be permitted to use
-# | it?”[-,-] his face falls, and he admits the answer is no. To avoid
-# | feeling discouraged, he either ignores this fact most of the time or
-# | adopts a cynical stance designed to minimize the importance of it.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Programmers also suffer psychosocial harm knowing that many users will not "
@@ -1258,15 +1251,6 @@
"por los mismos contratos y subvenciones gubernamentales que ahora respaldan "
"el desarrollo de software privativo."
-# | It is common today for university researchers to get grants to develop a
-# | system, develop it nearly to the point of completion and call that
-# | [-“finished”,-] {+“finished,”+} and then start
-# | companies where they really finish the project and make it usable.
-# | Sometimes they declare the unfinished version “free”; if they
-# | are thoroughly corrupt, they instead get an exclusive license from the
-# | university. This is not a secret; it is openly admitted by everyone
-# | concerned. Yet if the researchers were not exposed to the temptation to
-# | do these things, they would still do their research.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"It is common today for university researchers to get grants to develop a "
Index: philosophy/po/use-free-software.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/use-free-software.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- philosophy/po/use-free-software.es-en.html 21 Aug 2021 12:33:05 -0000
1.30
+++ philosophy/po/use-free-software.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000
1.31
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: .2em">
The Free Software Community After 20 Years: </h2>
<h3 style="margin: 0 0 1.2em">
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
It was 5 Jan 1984, twenty years ago today, that I quit my job at MIT
to begin developing a free software operating system,
@@ -50,7 +49,7 @@
Today we have a large community of users who run GNU, Linux and other
free software. Thousands of people would like to extend this, and
have adopted the goal of convincing more computer users to “use
-free software”. But what does it mean to “use free
+free software.” But what does it mean to “use free
software”? Does that mean escaping from proprietary software,
or merely installing free programs alongside it? Are we aiming to
lead people to freedom, or just introduce them to our code? In other
@@ -89,7 +88,7 @@
free while using a nonfree program. To free the citizens of
cyberspace, we have to replace those nonfree programs, not accept
them. They are not contributions to our community, they are
-temptations to settle for continuing non-freedom.</p>
+temptations to settle for continuing nonfreedom.</p>
<p>
There are two common motivations to develop a free program. One is
@@ -116,11 +115,10 @@
people to recognize the moral unacceptability of nonfree software.
People who value freedom are, in the long term, its best and essential
defense.</p>
-</div>
-<div class="infobox">
+<div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
<hr />
-<p>Originally published on NewsForge.</p>
+<p>Originally published on <cite>NewsForge</cite>.</p>
</div>
</div>
@@ -181,7 +179,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/21 12:33:05 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/use-free-software.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/use-free-software.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- philosophy/po/use-free-software.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000
1.37
+++ philosophy/po/use-free-software.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000
1.38
@@ -92,15 +92,6 @@
"que está prohibido compartirlo con los demás. Prohibir compartir software
es "
"cortar los lazos que unen la sociedad."
-# | Today we have a large community of users who run GNU, Linux and other free
-# | software. Thousands of people would like to extend this, and have adopted
-# | the goal of convincing more computer users to “use free
-# | [-software”.-] {+software.”+} But what does it mean to
-# | “use free software”? Does that mean escaping from proprietary
-# | software, or merely installing free programs alongside it? Are we aiming
-# | to lead people to freedom, or just introduce them to our code? In other
-# | words, are we working for freedom, or have we replaced that goal with the
-# | shallow goal of popularity?
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Today we have a large community of users who run GNU, Linux and other free "
@@ -176,11 +167,6 @@
"aprobar con entusiasmo todas las aplicaciones que funcionen en él, sean "
"libres o no. "
-# | But if our goal is freedom, that changes everything. Users cannot be free
-# | while using a nonfree program. To free the citizens of cyberspace, we
-# | have to replace those nonfree programs, not accept them. They are not
-# | contributions to our community, they are temptations to settle for
-# | continuing non[---]freedom.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"But if our goal is freedom, that changes everything. Users cannot be free "
@@ -246,7 +232,6 @@
"gente que valora la libertad es, a largo plazo, su mejor y más esencial "
"defensa. "
-# | Originally published on [-NewsForge.-] {+<cite>NewsForge</cite>.+}
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
msgid "Originally published on <cite>NewsForge</cite>."
msgstr "Publicado originalmente en <cite>NewsForge</cite>."
Index: philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:29 -0000 1.26
+++ philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.27
@@ -10,13 +10,12 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Using GNU FDL</h2>
<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
-<div class="article">
<p>If you know someone who is writing a manual about free software,
and looking towards commercial publication, you have a chance to help
the Free Software Movement a great deal with a small amount of work:
@@ -36,7 +35,7 @@
<p>But publishers are likely to first propose an ordinary proprietary
book. And if the authors agree, that's what it will be. So it is
essential for authors to take the lead; to say, “We want to use
-the GNU FDL for this book”. So when your friend mentions
+the GNU FDL for this book.” So when your friend mentions
writing a manual, you can influence the course of events simply by
pointing out this possibility.</p>
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@
optional clauses that can be enabled; the license is free if neither
optional clause is used, but enabling either of them makes the book
nonfree. (See <a href="/licenses/license-list.html">
-http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html.</a>) Authors that want
+gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html</a>.) Authors that want
to publish free documentation, but using a license other than the GNU
FDL, can contact us so we can check that the license really qualifies
for free documentation.</p>
@@ -66,7 +65,6 @@
should not be obnoxious about trying to persuade people to buy).
Please inform <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org";>
<webmasters@gnu.org></a> about such pages.</p>
-</div>
<hr class="column-limit" />
<p>See also <a href="/philosophy/free-doc.html">Free Software and Free
@@ -130,7 +128,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:29 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.30
+++ philosophy/po/using-gfdl.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:35 -0000 1.31
@@ -76,12 +76,6 @@
"decididos a ello."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | But publishers are likely to first propose an ordinary proprietary book.
-# | And if the authors agree, that's what it will be. So it is essential for
-# | authors to take the lead; to say, “We want to use the GNU FDL for
-# | this [-book”.-] {+book.”+} So when your friend mentions
-# | writing a manual, you can influence the course of events simply by
-# | pointing out this possibility.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"But publishers are likely to first propose an ordinary proprietary book. And "
@@ -110,17 +104,6 @@
"a>."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | There are <a href=\"/licenses/license-list.html#DocumentationLicenses\">
-# | other</a> legitimate free documentation licenses, but sometimes using them
-# | requires care. For example, one license is equipped with two optional
-# | clauses that can be enabled; the license is free if neither optional
-# | clause is used, but enabling either of them makes the book nonfree. (See
-# | <a href=\"/licenses/license-list.html\">
-# | [-http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html.</a>)-]
-# | {+gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html</a>.)+} Authors that want to publish
-# | free documentation, but using a license other than the GNU FDL, can
-# | contact us so we can check that the license really qualifies for free
-# | documentation.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"There are <a href=\"/licenses/license-list.html#DocumentationLicenses\"> "
Index: philosophy/po/why-copyleft.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- philosophy/po/why-copyleft.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.30
+++ philosophy/po/why-copyleft.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:36 -0000 1.31
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@
msgid "Why Copyleft?"
msgstr "¿Por qué Copyleft?"
-# | [-<cite>“When-]{+<em>When+} it comes to defending [-the freedom of
-# | others,-] {+everyone's freedom,+} to lie down and do nothing is an act of
-# | weakness, not [-humility.”</cite>-] {+humility.</em>+}
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
msgid ""
"<em>When it comes to defending everyone's freedom, to lie down and do "
@@ -57,12 +54,6 @@
"circunstancias), pero sus defensores adoptan una actitud crÃtica muy dura "
"contra la <abbr title=\"General Public License\">GPL</abbr>."
-# | In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
-# | licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
-# | those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a stretch
-# | to describe a legal demand for credit as [-“humility”,-]
-# | {+“humility,”+} but there is a deeper point to be considered
-# | here.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD "
@@ -137,10 +128,6 @@
"todo lo que existe para esas máquinas y (a menos que se lleve a cabo un "
"enorme trabajo de ingenierÃa inversa) es todo lo que existirá en el futuro."
-# | Intel uses <a
-# |
href=\"http{+s+}://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html\">a
-# | proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
-# | copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern processors.
#. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
msgid ""
"Intel uses <a href=\"https://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-";
@@ -198,10 +185,7 @@
"\">GuÃa para las traducciones</a> para obtener información sobre la "
"coordinación y el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web."
-# | Copyright © [-2014, 2015, 2016-] {+2003, 2017, 2021+} Free Software
-# | Foundation, Inc.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#| msgid "Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgid "Copyright © 2003, 2017, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgstr "Copyright © 2003, 2017, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
Index: philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.106
retrieving revision 1.107
diff -u -b -r1.106 -r1.107
--- philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html 5 Sep 2021 10:37:43 -0000
1.106
+++ philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:36 -0000
1.107
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
<p>
To refer to published works as “assets,” or “digital
assets,” is even worse than calling
-them <a href="#Content">“content”</a> — it presumes
+them <a href="#Content">“content”</a>—it presumes
they have no value to society except commercial value.</p>
<!-- GNUN-SORT-NEXT-ITEM -->
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@
<!-- GNUN-SORT-END-KEY -->
<p>
Copyright is an artificial privilege, handed out by the state to
-achieve a public interest and lasting a period of time — not a
+achieve a public interest and lasting a period of time—not a
natural right like owning a house or a shirt. Lawyers used to
recognize this by referring to the recipient of that privilege as a
“copyright holder.”</p>
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@
<!-- GNUN-SORT-END-KEY -->
<p>
The term “modern” makes sense from a descriptive
-perspective — for instance, solely to distinguish newer periods
+perspective—for instance, solely to distinguish newer periods
and ways from older ones.</p>
<p>It becomes a problem when it carries the presumption that older
@@ -1298,8 +1298,8 @@
ambiguous way. Ostensibly it refers to how a program's source is
distributed, but the text confuses this with the development
methodology. It distinguishes “open source” and
-”shared source” as answers, but they overlap —
-Microsoft uses the latter as a marketing term to cover a range of
+”shared source” as answers, but they overlap—Microsoft
+uses the latter as a marketing term to cover a range of
practices, some of which are “open source.” Thus, this
term really conveys no coherent information, but it provides an
opportunity to say “open source” in pages describing free
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:37:43 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.284
retrieving revision 1.285
diff -u -b -r1.284 -r1.285
--- philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:46:27 -0000 1.284
+++ philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:36 -0000 1.285
@@ -573,11 +573,6 @@
msgid "“Assets”"
msgstr "«Activos»"
-# | To refer to published works as “assets,” or “digital
-# | assets,” is even worse than calling them <a
-# | [-href=\"#Content\">“content”</a> — it-]
-# | {+href=\"#Content\">“content”</a>—it+} presumes they
-# | have no value to society except commercial value.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"To refer to published works as “assets,” or “digital "
@@ -1216,11 +1211,6 @@
msgid "“Copyright Owner”"
msgstr "«Propietario del copyright»"
-# | Copyright is an artificial privilege, handed out by the state to achieve a
-# | public interest and lasting a period of [-time — not-]
-# | {+time—not+} a natural right like owning a house or a shirt.
-# | Lawyers used to recognize this by referring to the recipient of that
-# | privilege as a “copyright holder.”
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Copyright is an artificial privilege, handed out by the state to achieve a "
@@ -1933,9 +1923,6 @@
msgid "“Modern”"
msgstr "«Moderno»"
-# | The term “modern” makes sense from a descriptive [-perspective
-# | — for-] {+perspective—for+} instance, solely to distinguish
-# | newer periods and ways from older ones.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The term “modern” makes sense from a descriptive "
@@ -2595,16 +2582,6 @@
msgid "“Source model”"
msgstr "«Modelo de código»"
-# | Wikipedia uses the term “source model” in a confused and
-# | ambiguous way. Ostensibly it refers to how a program's source is
-# | distributed, but the text confuses this with the development methodology.
-# | It distinguishes “open source” and ”shared source”
-# | as answers, but they [-overlap — Microsoft-]
-# | {+overlap—Microsoft+} uses the latter as a marketing term to cover a
-# | range of practices, some of which are “open source.” Thus,
-# | this term really conveys no coherent information, but it provides an
-# | opportunity to say “open source” in pages describing free
-# | software programs.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Wikipedia uses the term “source model” in a confused and "
Index: server/po/sitemap.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/server/po/sitemap.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.187
retrieving revision 1.188
diff -u -b -r1.187 -r1.188
--- server/po/sitemap.es-en.html 7 Sep 2021 11:35:50 -0000 1.187
+++ server/po/sitemap.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 11:04:37 -0000 1.188
@@ -1349,14 +1349,14 @@
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html">misinterpreting-copyright.html</a></dt>
<dd>Misinterpreting Copyright—A Series of Errors</dd>
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/moglen-harvard-speech-2004.html">moglen-harvard-speech-2004.html</a></dt>
- <dd>Eben Moglen - Speech for Harvard Journal of Law & Technology</dd>
+ <dd>Speech for Harvard Journal of Law & Technology</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/motif.html">motif.html</a></dt>
<dd>The Motif License</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/motivation.html">motivation.html</a></dt>
<dd>Studies Find Reward Often No Motivator</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/ms-doj-tunney.html">ms-doj-tunney.html</a></dt>
<dd>FSF Statement in Response to Proposed Revised Final Judgment
- in Microsoft vs. United States</dd>
+ in Microsoft v. United States</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/my_doom.html">my_doom.html</a></dt>
<dd>MyDoom and You</dd>
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/netscape-npl-old.html">netscape-npl-old.html</a></dt>
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@
<dt><a href="/philosophy/new-monopoly.html">new-monopoly.html</a></dt>
<dd>U.S. Congress Threatens to Establish a New Kind of Monopoly</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/nit-india.html">nit-india.html</a></dt>
- <dd>National Institute of Technology - Trichy - India - 17 February 2004</dd>
+ <dd>Speech on Free Software (2004)</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/no-ip-ethos.html">no-ip-ethos.html</a></dt>
<dd>Don't Let ‘Intellectual Property’ Twist Your Ethos</dd>
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html">no-word-attachments.html</a></dt>
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/rms-comment-longs-article.html">rms-comment-longs-article.html</a></dt>
<dd>Comments on Roderick Long's Article</dd>
<dt><a href="/philosophy/rms-hack.html">rms-hack.html</a></dt>
- <dd>The Hacker Community and Ethics: An Interview with Richard M. Stallman,
2002</dd>
+ <dd>The Hacker Community and Ethics</dd>
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/rms-interview-edinburgh.html">rms-interview-edinburgh.html</a></dt>
<dd>Interview with Richard Stallman, Edinburgh, 2004</dd>
<dt><a
href="/philosophy/rms-kernel-trap-interview.html">rms-kernel-trap-interview.html</a></dt>
@@ -2089,7 +2089,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/07 11:35:50 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 11:04:37 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: server/po/sitemap.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/server/po/sitemap.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.448
retrieving revision 1.449
diff -u -b -r1.448 -r1.449
--- server/po/sitemap.es.po 13 Sep 2021 10:52:18 -0000 1.448
+++ server/po/sitemap.es.po 13 Sep 2021 11:04:37 -0000 1.449
@@ -4710,9 +4710,7 @@
msgid "<a href=\"/philosophy/nit-india.html\">nit-india.html</a>"
msgstr "<a href=\"/philosophy/nit-india.html\">nit-india.html</a>"
-# | [-Selling-]{+Speech on+} Free Software {+(2004)+}
#. type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><dl><dd>
-#| msgid "Selling Free Software"
msgid "Speech on Free Software (2004)"
msgstr "Speech on Free Software (2004)"
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www philosophy/motif.es.html philosophy/my_doom...,
GNUN <=