[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po patent-practice-panel.fr.po p...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po patent-practice-panel.fr.po p... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 2021 17:31:52 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/09/09 17:31:52
Modified files:
philosophy/po : patent-practice-panel.fr.po
patent-practice-panel.pot
patent-practice-panel.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
Patches:
Index: patent-practice-panel.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- patent-practice-panel.fr.po 9 Sep 2021 20:33:04 -0000 1.37
+++ patent-practice-panel.fr.po 9 Sep 2021 21:31:52 -0000 1.38
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: patent-practice-panel.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 20:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 21:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2020-12-07 12:06+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <trad-gnu@april.org>\n"
@@ -46,12 +46,25 @@
msgstr "par <strong>Daniel B. Ravicher</strong>"
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
-msgid ""
-"<em>This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. "
-"Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on "
-"Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation "
-"for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The "
-"transcription was done by Aendrew Rininsland.</em>"
+# | [-<em>This-]{+This+} is a transcript of a panel presentation given by
+# | Daniel B. Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent
+# | Foundation on Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by
+# | the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels,
+# | Belgium. The transcription was done by Aendrew [-Rininsland.</em>-]
+# | {+Rininsland.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<em>This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. "
+#| "Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on "
+#| "Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation "
+#| "for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The "
+#| "transcription was done by Aendrew Rininsland.</em>"
+msgid ""
+"This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. Ravicher as "
+"the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on Wednesday, "
+"November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation for a Free "
+"Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The transcription "
+"was done by Aendrew Rininsland."
msgstr ""
"<em>Ceci est la transcription d'une présentation donnée par Daniel B. "
"Ravicher en tant que directeur exécutif de la </em>Public Patent "
@@ -144,9 +157,9 @@
# | — they-] {+advantage—they+} start out at an advantage. Well,
# | then, the next question to me is, “If we have software patents, does
# | that increase the advantage of large developers or decrease
-# | [-it?”,-] {+it?,”+} because the patent system could benefit
-# | small developers and therefore that could erode some of the naturally
-# | existing benefits that large corporations have.
+# | it?”[-,-] because the patent system could benefit small developers
+# | and therefore that could erode some of the naturally existing benefits
+# | that large corporations have.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "We have to recognize that even without software patents, large developers "
@@ -167,7 +180,7 @@
"software patents, large developers are still at an advantage—they "
"start out at an advantage. Well, then, the next question to me is, “If "
"we have software patents, does that increase the advantage of large "
-"developers or decrease it?,” because the patent system could benefit "
+"developers or decrease it?” because the patent system could benefit "
"small developers and therefore that could erode some of the naturally "
"existing benefits that large corporations have."
msgstr ""
@@ -280,10 +293,27 @@
"meilleur prix ?"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other
+# | side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they would
+# | call it a [-‘less-beneficial’-]
+# | {+“less-beneficial”+} patent system, I call it less-onerous,
+# | will harm their business, because people could copy them. Well, large
+# | businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really aren't. At least
+# | not by other large businesses, this is why they enter into cross-licenses
+# | all the time.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other "
+#| "side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they "
+#| "would call it a ‘less-beneficial’ patent system, I call it "
+#| "less-onerous, will harm their business, because people could copy them. "
+#| "Well, large businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really "
+#| "aren't. At least not by other large businesses, this is why they enter "
+#| "into cross-licenses all the time."
msgid ""
"Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other "
"side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they would "
-"call it a ‘less-beneficial’ patent system, I call it less-"
+"call it a “less-beneficial” patent system, I call it less-"
"onerous, will harm their business, because people could copy them. Well, "
"large businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really aren't. At "
"least not by other large businesses, this is why they enter into cross-"
@@ -301,12 +331,12 @@
# | If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is it
# | licensing its patent portfolio to every other big company in the world?
# | Because it can't stop them from copying it once they enter into that
-# | agreement, so this argument that , “Well, we're worried about people
-# | copying our [-software”,-] {+software,”+} the most likely
-# | people to copy your software are other large businesses because they have
-# | the resources and the ability and the distribution channels and the brand
-# | and the relationships. Why are you letting them copy it? You must not be
-# | that worried about it.
+# | agreement, so this argument that[- -], “Well, we're worried about
+# | people copying our [-software”,-] {+software,”+} the most
+# | likely people to copy your software are other large businesses because
+# | they have the resources and the ability and the distribution channels and
+# | the brand and the relationships. Why are you letting them copy it? You
+# | must not be that worried about it.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is "
@@ -322,7 +352,7 @@
"If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is it "
"licensing its patent portfolio to every other big company in the world? "
"Because it can't stop them from copying it once they enter into that "
-"agreement, so this argument that , “Well, we're worried about people "
+"agreement, so this argument that, “Well, we're worried about people "
"copying our software,” the most likely people to copy your software "
"are other large businesses because they have the resources and the ability "
"and the distribution channels and the brand and the relationships. Why are "
@@ -368,6 +398,29 @@
"négatif sur la concurrence dans l'industrie du logiciel."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is
+# | anti-competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success in
+# | the software industry in the hands of the patent office or in hands of the
+# | courts does. If you need examples, if people think that's just rhetoric or
+# | your opinion, just point to the United States. Microsoft is a very
+# | successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that.
+# | They've never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim
+# | they need patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They
+# | cross-license them and that's where we wonder, &l[-s-]{+d+}quo;If you're
+# | worried about people copying, then why are you cross-licensing them to
+# | [-people?’.-] {+people?”+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is "
+#| "anti-competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success "
+#| "in the software industry in the hands of the patent office or in hands of "
+#| "the courts does. If you need examples, if people think that's just "
+#| "rhetoric or your opinion, just point to the United States. Microsoft is a "
+#| "very successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that. "
+#| "They've never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim "
+#| "they need patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They cross-"
+#| "license them and that's where we wonder, ‘If you're worried about "
+#| "people copying, then why are you cross-licensing them to people?’."
msgid ""
"True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is anti-"
"competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success in the "
@@ -377,8 +430,8 @@
"successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that. They've "
"never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim they need "
"patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They cross-license them and "
-"that's where we wonder, ‘If you're worried about people copying, then "
-"why are you cross-licensing them to people?’."
+"that's where we wonder, “If you're worried about people copying, then "
+"why are you cross-licensing them to people?”"
msgstr ""
"C'est vrai, ils peuvent augmenter la concurrence de certaines façons, mais "
"l'effet net est anticoncurrentiel. Et c'est ce qui se passe quand on met la "
Index: patent-practice-panel.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- patent-practice-panel.pot 9 Sep 2021 20:33:04 -0000 1.12
+++ patent-practice-panel.pot 9 Sep 2021 21:31:52 -0000 1.13
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: patent-practice-panel.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 20:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 21:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
msgid ""
-"<em>This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. "
-"Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on "
-"Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation "
-"for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The "
-"transcription was done by Aendrew Rininsland.</em>"
+"This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. Ravicher as "
+"the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on Wednesday, "
+"November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation for a Free "
+"Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The transcription "
+"was done by Aendrew Rininsland."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
"software patents, large developers are still at an advantage—they "
"start out at an advantage. Well, then, the next question to me is, “If "
"we have software patents, does that increase the advantage of large "
-"developers or decrease it?,” because the patent system could benefit "
+"developers or decrease it?” because the patent system could benefit "
"small developers and therefore that could erode some of the naturally "
"existing benefits that large corporations have."
msgstr ""
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
msgid ""
"Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other "
"side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they would "
-"call it a ‘less-beneficial’ patent system, I call it "
+"call it a “less-beneficial” patent system, I call it "
"less-onerous, will harm their business, because people could copy "
"them. Well, large businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really "
"aren't. At least not by other large businesses, this is why they enter into "
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
"If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is it "
"licensing its patent portfolio to every other big company in the world? "
"Because it can't stop them from copying it once they enter into that "
-"agreement, so this argument that , “Well, we're worried about people "
+"agreement, so this argument that, “Well, we're worried about people "
"copying our software,” the most likely people to copy your software "
"are other large businesses because they have the resources and the ability "
"and the distribution channels and the brand and the relationships. Why are "
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@
"successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that. They've "
"never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim they need "
"patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They cross-license them and "
-"that's where we wonder, ‘If you're worried about people copying, then "
-"why are you cross-licensing them to people?’."
+"that's where we wonder, “If you're worried about people copying, then "
+"why are you cross-licensing them to people?”"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: patent-practice-panel.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/patent-practice-panel.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- patent-practice-panel.ru.po 9 Sep 2021 20:33:04 -0000 1.3
+++ patent-practice-panel.ru.po 9 Sep 2021 21:31:52 -0000 1.4
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: patent-practice-panel.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 20:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2021-09-09 21:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-01-28 16:07+0400\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <ineiev@gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <www-ru-list@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -43,12 +43,25 @@
msgstr "<strong>ÐениÑл Ð. РейвиÑеÑ</strong>"
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
-msgid ""
-"<em>This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. "
-"Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on "
-"Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation "
-"for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The "
-"transcription was done by Aendrew Rininsland.</em>"
+# | [-<em>This-]{+This+} is a transcript of a panel presentation given by
+# | Daniel B. Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent
+# | Foundation on Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by
+# | the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels,
+# | Belgium. The transcription was done by Aendrew [-Rininsland.</em>-]
+# | {+Rininsland.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<em>This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. "
+#| "Ravicher as the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on "
+#| "Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation "
+#| "for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The "
+#| "transcription was done by Aendrew Rininsland.</em>"
+msgid ""
+"This is a transcript of a panel presentation given by Daniel B. Ravicher as "
+"the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation on Wednesday, "
+"November 10, 2004, at a conference organized by the Foundation for a Free "
+"Information Infrastructure (FFII) in Brussels, Belgium. The transcription "
+"was done by Aendrew Rininsland."
msgstr ""
"<em>ÐÑо запиÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ÐºÐ»Ð°Ð´Ð°, Ñделанного ÐениÑлом
Ð. РейвиÑеÑом в каÑеÑÑве "
"иÑполниÑелÑного диÑекÑоÑа ÐÑблиÑного
паÑенÑного Ñонда в ÑÑедÑ, 10 ноÑбÑÑ "
@@ -136,9 +149,9 @@
# | — they-] {+advantage—they+} start out at an advantage. Well,
# | then, the next question to me is, “If we have software patents, does
# | that increase the advantage of large developers or decrease
-# | [-it?”,-] {+it?,”+} because the patent system could benefit
-# | small developers and therefore that could erode some of the naturally
-# | existing benefits that large corporations have.
+# | it?”[-,-] because the patent system could benefit small developers
+# | and therefore that could erode some of the naturally existing benefits
+# | that large corporations have.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "We have to recognize that even without software patents, large developers "
@@ -159,7 +172,7 @@
"software patents, large developers are still at an advantage—they "
"start out at an advantage. Well, then, the next question to me is, “If "
"we have software patents, does that increase the advantage of large "
-"developers or decrease it?,” because the patent system could benefit "
+"developers or decrease it?” because the patent system could benefit "
"small developers and therefore that could erode some of the naturally "
"existing benefits that large corporations have."
msgstr ""
@@ -270,10 +283,27 @@
"пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ наилÑÑÑей Ñене?"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other
+# | side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they would
+# | call it a [-‘less-beneficial’-]
+# | {+“less-beneficial”+} patent system, I call it less-onerous,
+# | will harm their business, because people could copy them. Well, large
+# | businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really aren't. At least
+# | not by other large businesses, this is why they enter into cross-licenses
+# | all the time.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other "
+#| "side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they "
+#| "would call it a ‘less-beneficial’ patent system, I call it "
+#| "less-onerous, will harm their business, because people could copy them. "
+#| "Well, large businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really "
+#| "aren't. At least not by other large businesses, this is why they enter "
+#| "into cross-licenses all the time."
msgid ""
"Now, I think it's important to concede the point that people on the other "
"side will make, which is, will a less-onerous patent system, or they would "
-"call it a ‘less-beneficial’ patent system, I call it less-"
+"call it a “less-beneficial” patent system, I call it less-"
"onerous, will harm their business, because people could copy them. Well, "
"large businesses aren't worried about being copied. They really aren't. At "
"least not by other large businesses, this is why they enter into cross-"
@@ -292,12 +322,12 @@
# | If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is it
# | licensing its patent portfolio to every other big company in the world?
# | Because it can't stop them from copying it once they enter into that
-# | agreement, so this argument that , “Well, we're worried about people
-# | copying our [-software”,-] {+software,”+} the most likely
-# | people to copy your software are other large businesses because they have
-# | the resources and the ability and the distribution channels and the brand
-# | and the relationships. Why are you letting them copy it? You must not be
-# | that worried about it.
+# | agreement, so this argument that[- -], “Well, we're worried about
+# | people copying our [-software”,-] {+software,”+} the most
+# | likely people to copy your software are other large businesses because
+# | they have the resources and the ability and the distribution channels and
+# | the brand and the relationships. Why are you letting them copy it? You
+# | must not be that worried about it.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is "
@@ -313,7 +343,7 @@
"If a large company really didn't want its software to be copied, why is it "
"licensing its patent portfolio to every other big company in the world? "
"Because it can't stop them from copying it once they enter into that "
-"agreement, so this argument that , “Well, we're worried about people "
+"agreement, so this argument that, “Well, we're worried about people "
"copying our software,” the most likely people to copy your software "
"are other large businesses because they have the resources and the ability "
"and the distribution channels and the brand and the relationships. Why are "
@@ -357,6 +387,29 @@
"индÑÑÑÑии ÑказÑваÑÑÑÑ Ð¾ÑÑиÑаÑелÑно."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is
+# | anti-competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success in
+# | the software industry in the hands of the patent office or in hands of the
+# | courts does. If you need examples, if people think that's just rhetoric or
+# | your opinion, just point to the United States. Microsoft is a very
+# | successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that.
+# | They've never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim
+# | they need patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They
+# | cross-license them and that's where we wonder, &l[-s-]{+d+}quo;If you're
+# | worried about people copying, then why are you cross-licensing them to
+# | [-people?’.-] {+people?”+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is "
+#| "anti-competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success "
+#| "in the software industry in the hands of the patent office or in hands of "
+#| "the courts does. If you need examples, if people think that's just "
+#| "rhetoric or your opinion, just point to the United States. Microsoft is a "
+#| "very successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that. "
+#| "They've never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim "
+#| "they need patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They cross-"
+#| "license them and that's where we wonder, ‘If you're worried about "
+#| "people copying, then why are you cross-licensing them to people?’."
msgid ""
"True, they may increase competition in some ways, but the net-effect is anti-"
"competitive. And that's what putting the ability to decide success in the "
@@ -366,8 +419,8 @@
"successful software company, I don't think anyone would debate that. They've "
"never had to sue anyone for patent infringement. So they claim they need "
"patents, but yet they've never had to use them. They cross-license them and "
-"that's where we wonder, ‘If you're worried about people copying, then "
-"why are you cross-licensing them to people?’."
+"that's where we wonder, “If you're worried about people copying, then "
+"why are you cross-licensing them to people?”"
msgstr ""
"Ðни могÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð²ÑÑаÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÐºÑÑенÑÐ¸Ñ Ð²
некоÑоÑÑÑ
оÑноÑениÑÑ
, ÑÑо веÑно, но в "
"ÑÑеднем они ее подавлÑÑÑ. ÐÑо-Ñо Ð¼Ñ Ð¸
делаем, когда пеÑедаем возможноÑÑÑ "
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/po patent-practice-panel.fr.po p...,
GNUN <=