[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2021 13:59:00 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/05/06 13:59:00
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 26 Apr 2021 12:04:27 -0000
1.34
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 6 May 2021 17:59:00 -0000
1.35
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/04/26 12:04:27 $
+$Date: 2021/05/06 17:59:00 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 6 May 2021 17:53:35 -0000 1.53
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 6 May 2021 17:59:00 -0000 1.54
@@ -141,23 +141,6 @@
"vrije software” te voorkomen, maar al snel werd het geassocieerd met "
"filosofische overtuigingen die niets met vrije software van doen hadden."
-# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
-# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
-# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
-# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
-# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
-# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
-# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
-# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
-# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
-# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
-# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
-# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
-# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
-# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\";>
-# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
-# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
-# | many that don't.+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
@@ -194,18 +177,6 @@
"minderheid binnen de open bron beweging zeggen nu dat vrijheid hier een "
"onderdeel van is maar dit is een slecht zichtbare minderheid."
-# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
-# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
-# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
-# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
-# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
-# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
-# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
-# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
-# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
-# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
-# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\";>
-# | typical example</a>.-]
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
@@ -250,12 +221,6 @@
"vrijheidsgevoel niet bijbrengt. Als je dat belangrijk vindt kun je maar "
"beter spreken over “vrije software.”"
-# | We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as an
-# | enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software. But we want people to
-# | know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being mislabeled as open
-# | source supporters. {+What we advocate is not “open source,”
-# | and what we oppose is not “closed source”. To make this
-# | clear, we avoid using those terms.+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as an "
@@ -320,16 +285,6 @@
"kunnen dan echter die broncode gebruiken om te compileren en te verpreiden "
"als vrije code."
-# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
-# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
-# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
-# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
-# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
-# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
-# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
-# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
-# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
@@ -363,11 +318,6 @@
"GPL versie 3 in het leven geroepen."
# verduidelijkt
-# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
-# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
-# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
-# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
@@ -1043,10 +993,7 @@
"href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\"> Translations README</a> "
"voor informatie over het onderhoud van vertalingen op deze website."
-# | Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, [-2016-] {+2016, 2019, 2020,
-# | 2021+} Richard Stallman
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#| msgid "Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgid ""
"Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2019, 2020, 2021 Richard "
"Stallman"