www/philosophy why-copyleft.nl.html po/why-copy...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/04/06 02:32:15

Modified files:
        philosophy     : why-copyleft.nl.html 
        philosophy/po  : why-copyleft.nl-en.html why-copyleft.nl.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17

Patches:
Index: why-copyleft.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- why-copyleft.nl.html        4 Apr 2021 08:58:20 -0000       1.19
+++ why-copyleft.nl.html        6 Apr 2021 06:32:13 -0000       1.20
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.86 -->
@@ -13,7 +8,6 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
 <h2>Waarom Copyleft?</h2>
 
 <p>
@@ -42,27 +36,48 @@
 
 <p>
 Nederigheid is het verloochenen van je eigen belangen, maar jij en degene
-die je code gebruiken zijn niet de enigen die worden be&iuml;nvloed door jouw
-keuze van software-licentie. Iemand die jouw code gebruikt in een niet-vrij
-programma probeert anderen hun vrijheid te ontzeggen en als je dat toestaat
-dan verdedig je niet hun vrijheid. Als het erop aan komt de vrijheid van
-anderen te verdedigen is niets doen en je in de situatie schikken een teken
-van zwakte, niet van nederigheid.
+die je code gebruiken zijn niet de enigen die worden be&iuml;nvloed door
+jouw keuze van software-licentie. Iemand die jouw code gebruikt in een
+niet-vrij programma probeert anderen hun vrijheid te ontzeggen en als je dat
+toestaat dan verdedig je niet hun vrijheid. Als het erop aan komt de
+vrijheid van anderen te verdedigen is niets doen en je in de situatie
+schikken een teken van zwakte, niet van nederigheid.
 </p>
 
 <p>
 Je code uitbrengen onder <a href="/licenses/bsd.html">&eacute;&eacute;n van
 de BSD licenties</a>, of enige andere losse niet-copyleft licentie, is niet
-iets fouts: het programma is nog steeds vrije software en nog steeds een
-bijdrage aan de gemeenschap.  Maar het is zwak en meestal niet de beste
-manier om de vrijheid van gebruikers, om software uit te wisselen en te
-veranderen, te steunen.
+fout: het programma is nog steeds vrije software en nog steeds een bijdrage
+aan de gemeenschap.  Maar het is zwak en meestal niet de beste manier om de
+vrijheid van gebruikers, om software uit te wisselen en te veranderen, te
+steunen.
 </p>
 
+<p>
+Hier voorbeelden van niet-vrije versies van programma's die grote schade aan
+de vrije wereld hebben berokkend.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Degenen die  LLVM uitbrachten onder een non-copyleft licentie <a
+href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of";>gaven
+nVidia de mogelijkheid een niet-vrije, kwalitatief hoogwaardige compiler
+uit te brengen </a> voor hun grafische processor, zonder de instructieset te
+publiceren en geheim te houden.  We kunnen dus geen vrije compiler maken
+voor dat platform zonder reverse engineering.  De niet-vrije versie van
+LLVM is de enige compiler voor deze machines en dat blijft waarschijnlijk
+zo.</li>
+
+<li>Intel gebruikt <a
+href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html";>een
+commerciële versie van het MINIX systeem</a>, dat is vrij maar niet
+copyleft, in het Management Engine achterdeurtje van hun moderne
+processoren.</li>
+</ul>
+
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
- </div>
+*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S NOTES*</div>
 </div>
 
 <!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
@@ -106,14 +121,17 @@
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
      document was modified, or published.
+     
      If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
      Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
      years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
      year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
      being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2020  Free Software
+Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Deze pagina is uitgebracht onder een <a rel="license"
 href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.nl";>Creative
@@ -123,12 +141,12 @@
 <div class="translators-credits">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
- </div>
+*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*</div>
 
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Bijgewerkt:
 
-$Date: 2021/04/04 08:58:20 $
+$Date: 2021/04/06 06:32:13 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/why-copyleft.nl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/why-copyleft.nl-en.html  12 Jul 2014 12:59:33 -0000      1.6
+++ po/why-copyleft.nl-en.html  6 Apr 2021 06:32:14 -0000       1.7
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.86 -->
 <title>Why Copyleft?
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@
 
 <p>
 In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
-use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like GNU
+use <a href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like GNU
 GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses.  We
 don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses&mdash;in fact,
 we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances&mdash;but the
 advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
-the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+the <abbr title="General Public License">GPL</abbr>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -31,23 +31,43 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Humility is abnegating your own self interest, but you and the one who
-uses your code are not the only ones affected by your choice of which
-free software license to use for your code.  Someone who uses your
-code in a nonfree program is trying to deny freedom to others, and if
-you let him do it, you're failing to defend their freedom.  When it
-comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie down and do nothing
-is an act of weakness, not humility.
+Humility is disregarding your own self-interest, but the interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft your code is much bigger than your
+own.  Someone who uses your code in a nonfree program is denying
+freedom to others, so if you allow that, you're failing to defend
+those people's freedom.  When it comes to defending everyone's
+freedom, to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not
+humility.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Releasing your code under one of the BSD licenses, or some other
-permissive non-copyleft license, is not doing wrong; the program is
-still free software, and still a contribution to our community.  But
-it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best way to promote users'
-freedom to share and change software.
+Releasing your code under <a href="/licenses/bsd.html"> one of the BSD
+licenses</a>, or some other lax, permissive license, is not doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community.  But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
 </p>
 
+<p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a 
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of";>enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret.  Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job.  The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a 
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html";>a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul>
+
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
 <div id="footer">
@@ -80,7 +100,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -95,20 +115,20 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2020 Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/07/12 12:59:33 $
+$Date: 2021/04/06 06:32:14 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-</div>
+</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>

Index: po/why-copyleft.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/why-copyleft.nl.po       6 Apr 2021 06:21:18 -0000       1.16
+++ po/why-copyleft.nl.po       6 Apr 2021 06:32:15 -0000       1.17
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-12-11 09:56+0000\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 2.3\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -68,16 +67,6 @@
 "vereist een flexibele geest om een juridische eis tot bronvermelding als "
 "&ldquo;nederig&rdquo; te bestempelen, maar er zit meer aan vast."
 
-# | Humility is [-abnegating-] {+disregarding+} your own self-interest, but
-# | [-you and-] the [-one who uses-] {+interest you abandon when you don't
-# | copyleft+} your code [-are not the only ones affected by your choice of
-# | which free software license to use for-] {+is much bigger than+} your
-# | [-code.-] {+own.+}  Someone who uses your code in a nonfree program is
-# | [-trying to deny-] {+denying+} freedom to others, [-and-] {+so+} if you
-# | [-let him do it,-] {+allow that,+} you're failing to defend [-their-]
-# | {+those people's+} freedom.  When it comes to defending [-the freedom of
-# | others,-] {+everyone's freedom,+} to lie down and do nothing is an act of
-# | weakness, not humility.
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "Humility is disregarding your own self-interest, but the interest you "
@@ -95,11 +84,6 @@
 "vrijheid van anderen te verdedigen is niets doen en je in de situatie "
 "schikken een teken van zwakte, niet van nederigheid."
 
-# | Releasing your code under <a href=\"/licenses/bsd.html\"> one of the BSD
-# | licenses</a>, or some other {+lax,+} permissive [-non-copyleft-] license,
-# | is not doing wrong; the program is still free software, and still a
-# | contribution to our community.  But it is weak, and in most cases it is
-# | not the best way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "Releasing your code under <a href=\"/licenses/bsd.html\"> one of the BSD "
@@ -196,8 +180,6 @@
 "href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\"> Translations README</a> "
 "voor informatie over het onderhoud van vertalingen op deze website."
 
-# | Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, [-2013-] {+2013, 2017, 2018, 2020+}
-# | Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid ""
 "Copyright &copy; 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2020 Free Software "